The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Become a true leader is hard. Prompt claims that people should encourage its young generation to be cooperative in order to become leaders in any field. However, I strongly disagree with this statement for two reasons, which I will explain below.
To begin with, leaders need to have competitive behaviour because nowadays in all sectors people fight with each other in order to get place in the market. Even in the basic rules of economy we have competetive market where all customers have a choice to purschase goods from the better sellers. For example, when leader have a hard time for his organization, he needs to take decision on the basis of his own knowledge and skills. At this time competitive behavior can help, and leads to the prosperiety of the organization. Therefore, nowadays people with competitive behavior can become successful in any field.
In addition to the above mentioned argument, cooperation can sometimes lead to decline in the prosperiety of the companies. When leader has a cooperative behavior, he can betray the secrets of his or her organization. To clarify, in local company, called Asco Industries, one of the leaders had interview with new employee, at that time employee asked subtle questions in order to get insights from the manager. As a result, Asco had big scandal because this "new" employee were send from competitive company. Consequently, leaders in any field should not cooperate with everyone in order to keep secrets of the company.
In conclusion, authority have to be competitive in their behavior in order to survive in the nowadays economy. In addition, cooperative attitude towards everyone leads to the loss of the useful information of the organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 55
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons, which I will explain below. To begin with, leaders need to have comp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r can become successful in any field. In addition to the above mentioned argum...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...l because this 'new' employee were send from competitive company. Conseque...
^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sent'.
Suggestion: sent
...ause this 'new' employee were send from competitive company. Consequently,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...order to keep secrets of the company. In conclusion, authority have to be comp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.6327345309 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 280.0 441.139720559 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16428571429 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96544727672 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0593148187 57.8364921388 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.70786347227 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148987310862 0.218282227539 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052747387754 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448355807139 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956244733048 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436419058913 0.0628817314937 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.