I totally agree with the given statement that the best way fo a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
From a very young age, people should be educated on what true leadership is. Stating a quotation from the Economic Times, 'A true leader is the one who keeps his tribe above his emotions'. Competitiveness is a great virtue when it comes to achieving unparallel success in our lives. But for a leader, this may not be entirely true. The most important job of a leader is to think and act for the greater good of this tribe and not let their personal emotions come in way of that. When people become competitive, they start expecting something as their own and tend to forget the reason why they started on this journey of leadership in the first place. Competitiveness also leads to ego and jealousy. This makes a leader selfish and their only aim becomes to prove themselves right. They start taking their position for granted, thus causing a downfall of the entire organisation. Such behavior is never a characteristic of a good leader. A good leader is the one who understands people's expectations of them, thinks of the well being of their people or organisation and would not shame away from letting go of his competitiveness or ego for the greater good. They understand they although they might be the leader, they are still a part of the group as everyone else and it is only through cooperation with others that they can achieve their goles. These values should be instilled in young people for them to become ideal leaders in the future.
Secondly, competitiveness makes sore loosers. An organisation or a government might have multiple people for a leadership position. Now suppose one of their leader prospect is competitive and they fail to get that leadership position, they would not take the loss gracefully. They would hold a grudge against the entire organistaion, espcially the person who did get chosen as the leader. In every action that they do, they will try to act out in order to take out their anger. Their would not cooperate with the current leadership or with other people in their group. This would damage the decorum of the entire organisation, thus leading to its downfall.
Lastly, if a leader does not know how to cooperate, they would not get anything done both intra and inter organisation. If we take example of a government, suppose their leader is not cooperative. People inside their part would have trouble getting things done. If someone has a good idea and they propose the same to their leader, he would not cooperate and take it forward. What good does a leadership do to the society. Secondly, the ruling party has to cooperate with the other local parties, who might be managing a state. If this cooperation is also missing between their leaders, no actual development could happen in an area. The common people would be deprived of all the benefits that were promised to them during the election season just because the leaders cannot coopearte and work for the greater good. Hence this value of cooperation is very important to be instilled in young people to make them good leaders in future.
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaint 64
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 66
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 818, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...oopearte and work for the greater good. Hence this value of cooperation is very impor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 926, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... young people to make them good leaders in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, as to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2711.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81527531083 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72688826338 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472468916519 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 842.4 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.890569705 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3666666667 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7666666667 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186569947786 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599248556627 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795206457987 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184979624501 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133584547721 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 818, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...oopearte and work for the greater good. Hence this value of cooperation is very impor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 926, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... young people to make them good leaders in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, as to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2711.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81527531083 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72688826338 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472468916519 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 842.4 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.890569705 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3666666667 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7666666667 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186569947786 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599248556627 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795206457987 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184979624501 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133584547721 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.