While competition is necessary for achieving the posts in different areas such as leadership in government, industry, research etc., cooperation ultimately has the upper hand when success parameters are considered, for any project.
Cooperating with a bunch of people provides every member in the group, access to different skills that each group member brings to the table. It is when these skills are combined that magic happens, projects delivered on time and missions achieved with the highest degree of success. For instance, ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation) or NASA involves several positions like Software Engineers, Hardware Engineers, Chip Designers, Mechanical Engineers etc., in major projects. A software engineer is not expected to know things that a mechanical engineer does and vice versa. Project managers leverage the unique skills that each designation offers and combine them to complete a mission.
Taking another leaf from the above example, a MARS mission is provided with a fixed amount of resources from different departments in the organisation.
Cooperation becomes tough in case the employers compete with each other on a regular basis. An employee, is rather expected to perform well in his/her domain instead of competing with team members. Doing so only results in reduced efficiency of every person involved and leads to profligacy. Instead, the organisation would combine forces and try to achieve a task in a shorter duration.
Futhermore, cooperating with like minded people on a research area might bring in different perspectives due to the unique set of experiences that a person possesses. This has the potential to improve the execution speed, reduce possible errors that a single person may not notice, and help solve tough challenges in a ingenious way.
However, on the other hand, competition may be required to get your foot in the door during the initial stages. For example, a company would only hire the best candidates for the job. Here, competition among the job applicants is of utmost importance. Post the screening stages, successful applicants are only required to cooperate with other team members to successfully deliver a project. Additionally, there might be several companies competing for the top spot in a given domain. Companies fight a tough battle to defend their position or move ahead of the competition using cooperation, at a macro level.
Thus, to conclude, competition has its place in any given process, but ultimately, cooperation is the primary driver.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- GRE Argument: An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, far 62
- Issue Essay:-People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 315, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a ingenious way" with adverb for "ingenious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...notice, and help solve tough challenges in a ingenious way. However, on the other hand, competi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 318, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ice, and help solve tough challenges in a ingenious way. However, on the other...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.292134831461 0.240241500013 122% => OK
Verbs: 0.150561797753 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0831460674157 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404494382022 0.0497285424764 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0134831460674 0.0444667217837 30% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121348314607 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0449438202247 0.0406280797675 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90216989174 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0314606741573 0.030933414821 102% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116853932584 0.0997080785238 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0134831460674 0.0249443105267 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00449438202247 0.0148568991511 30% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2541.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 397.0 452.878318584 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.40050377834 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.428211586902 0.366273622748 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335012594458 0.280924506359 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.259445843829 0.200843997647 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.168765743073 0.132149295362 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90216989174 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594458438287 0.48968727796 121% => OK
Word variations: 71.7971439271 55.4138127331 130% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.85 23.380412469 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5340597523 59.4972553346 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.05 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.85 23.380412469 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.674092028746 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 53.3512594458 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.24175824176 1.64882698954 136% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398201344849 0.391690518653 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0728459320282 0.123202303941 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0279850669899 0.077325440228 36% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572145562971 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.199338050462 0.149214159877 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132309359267 0.161403998019 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535028824726 0.0892212321368 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.209085641787 0.385218514788 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0395161560035 0.0692045440612 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211233695346 0.275328986314 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597776271663 0.0653680567796 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.