In all actuality, I think it is more probable that our bodies will surely deteriorate long before our minds do in any significant amount. Who can't say that technology has made us lazier, but that's the key word, lazy, not stupid. The ever increasing amount of technology that we incorporate into our daily lives makes people think and learn every day, possibly more than ever before. Our abilities to think, learn, philosophize, etc. may even reach limits never dreamed of before by average people. Using technology to solve problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race.
If you think about it, using technology to solve more complicating problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning, opening up whole new worlds for many people. Many of these people are glad for the chance to expand their horizons by learning more, going to new places, and trying new things. If it wasn't for the invention of new technological devices, I wouldn't be sitting at this computer trying to philosophize about technology. It would be extremely hard for children in much poorer countries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet. Think what an impact the printing press, a technologically superior mackine at the time, had on the ability of the human race to learn and think.
Right now we are seeing a golden age of technology, using it all the time during our every day lives. When we get up there's instant coffee and the microwave and all these great things that help us get ready for our day. But we aren't allowing our minds to deteriorate by using them, we are only making things easier for ourselves and saving time for other important things in our days. Going off to school or work in our cars instead of a horse and buggy. Think of the brain power and genius that was used to come up with that single invention that has changed the way we move across this globe.
Using technology to solve our continually more complicated problems as a human race is definately a good thing. Our ability to think for ourselves isn't deteriorating, it's continuing to grow, moving on to higher though functions and more ingenious ideas. The ability to use what technology we have is an example
- Issue Essay:-People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with out stations's coverage of weath 54
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...minds do in any significant amount. Who cant say that technology has made us lazier,...
^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...that technology has made us lazier, but thats the key word, lazy, not stupid. The eve...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ew places, and trying new things. If it wasnt for the invention of new technological ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...vention of new technological devices, I wouldnt be sitting at this computer trying to p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...tries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet. Think wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ing our every day lives. When we get up theres instant coffee and the microwave and al...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...t help us get ready for our day. But we arent allowing our minds to deteriorate by us...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ing. Our ability to think for ourselves isnt deteriorating, its continuing to grow, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...think for ourselves isnt deteriorating, its continuing to grow, moving on to higher...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'i think']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.191142191142 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.191142191142 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0885780885781 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.048951048951 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0839160839161 0.0444667217837 189% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.11655011655 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0559440559441 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56922965384 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.041958041958 0.030933414821 136% => OK
Particles: 0.00932400932401 0.0016655270985 560% => OK
Determiners: 0.0769230769231 0.0997080785238 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00932400932401 0.0249443105267 37% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016317016317 0.0148568991511 110% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2249.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 392.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73724489796 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.311224489796 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.196428571429 0.280924506359 70% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.140306122449 0.200843997647 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102040816327 0.132149295362 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56922965384 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 219.290929204 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 63.705845033 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6315789474 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.82315302 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.368421053 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.263157894737 0.674092028746 39% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 40.2744360902 51.4728631049 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.12230215827 1.64882698954 68% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51406336752 0.391690518653 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123529294957 0.123202303941 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0991146786316 0.077325440228 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.50073925129 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.109824811381 0.149214159877 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1758289874 0.161403998019 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863423382269 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.273086421546 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0380117232795 0.0692045440612 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345216287575 0.275328986314 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103466808151 0.0653680567796 158% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum three arguments wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.