This statement about imposing the limits on the amount of trash being accepted from each household may limit the amount of waste for the municipal community but it hardly justifies if it could limit the trash as a whole. This solution may lead the uneducated customers to find other unethical ways to dispose the garbage.
To exemplify this consider how the indian society reacted on the restriction of the gas cylinders per year per family by the indian government. They tried to circumvent the restriction and did not hesitate to follow a grey route by buying the cylinders in black at marked up prices or by legally showing the 2 families living under a single roof.
To add to an adage: Do for me and I will forget, make me do and I will understand , let me do and I will learn and today's man says 'you impose on me and I will rebel'.
Therefore, this restriction may reduce the amount of garbage say by 1% but if we want to solve the environment problems which has invaded the area on a large scale we need to follow a multifold and more pragmatic approach which starts from educating and making the customers aware about the environment problems.
Educating and enlightening people about the correct waste disposal is necessary because most of them are not aware of it and dump everything at one place altogether deteriorating the quality of the environment.
Secondly, the use of plastics can be restricted with the re-usable items like cloth woven bags or jute bags. Plastic is the biggest enemy of the environment and its use should be limited to as low as possible. One plastic bag takes around 1 million years to be decomposed. Consider the amount of plastic which is used and thrown everyday!
Thirdly regular inspections by the authorities to check for improper use of resources at neighbouring areas which may arouse a fear of being caught while doing the unjudicious use of the resources.
Furthermore we can teach them how one can donate old books or reusable items to a charity instead of throwing them away. How one can utilize the peels of some vegetables and fruits which are edible too rather than throwing them. Some peels can also be used for cleansing action plus other beauty benefits like peel of an orange radiates the skin. Waste water can be used for irrigating plants and extra food can be distributed to needy.
At last , we cannot control the waste just by restricting the limit of the waste collected from the homes but by a more widely held multidirectional approach. We need to educate the humans that how the waste is affecting the environment and thereby deteriorating the quality of our life only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...forget, make me do and I will understand , let me do and I will learn and todays m...
^^
Line 10, column 330, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...unt of plastic which is used and thrown everyday! Thirdly regular inspections by the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...he unjudicious use of the resources. Furthermore we can teach them how one can donate ol...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... can be distributed to needy. At last , we cannot control the waste just by res...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20987654321 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.19341563786 0.157235817809 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.059670781893 0.0880659088768 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0432098765432 0.0497285424764 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0493827160494 0.0444667217837 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123456790123 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0699588477366 0.0406280797675 172% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7007540521 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0308641975309 0.030933414821 100% => OK
Particles: 0.00205761316872 0.0016655270985 124% => OK
Determiners: 0.119341563786 0.0997080785238 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037037037037 0.0249443105267 148% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0205761316872 0.0148568991511 138% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2647.0 2732.02544248 97% => OK
No of words: 462.0 452.878318584 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72943722944 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.309523809524 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.218614718615 0.280924506359 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162337662338 0.200843997647 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123376623377 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7007540521 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 219.290929204 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 63.9221689483 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.6666666667 23.380412469 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9613579301 59.4972553346 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.055555556 141.124799967 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.380412469 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.94800884956 182% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.5281385281 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.41007194245 1.64882698954 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482286809138 0.391690518653 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129405108583 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.065559844933 0.077325440228 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.718135548822 0.547984918172 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.198815742349 0.149214159877 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187582381731 0.161403998019 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814725331502 0.0892212321368 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.212918869374 0.385218514788 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0986636567805 0.0692045440612 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253753938622 0.275328986314 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702642398481 0.0653680567796 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.30420353982 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.