The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Recently, a prevalent statement people often see is that imposing limitation on accepcting waste is beneficial for solving environmental problems. This is because the less amount of waste would not only cost less but also reduce the generation of harmful substance. Opponents, nonetheless, argue that such limitation would cause some bad influence. From my personal view, both are reasonable when concerning the distinction of recycling waste and garbage which could not be recycled or even harmful. The details would be discussed below.
To begin with, the government is essential to limit the amount of waste which could not be recycled. For instance, glass, battery, paint and so on. The waste from those items could not be used to create new products. There is universally acknowledged that the most normal method to deal with these wastes is interring or throwing into the sea which both causes potential drawback. At the same time, these two ways are also could not be used for a long time. In this case, it is fair to claim that promising as less waste which is harmful to the environment as possible is necessary. Hence, limiting the trash which could not be recycled is significant.
On the other hand, limiting recycled waste is unnecessary. Many products contemporary are environment friendly. That is meaning they are designed to cause no damage or even promise some potential benefits. Depending on a study from the University of Tokyo, the source comes from recycling could take up the 67-percent of total used material. The outcome shows the extraordinary significant of recycling. In this condition, imposing limitation on recycling such waste is also meant placing a limitation on resources. At the same time, assume that citizens discard recycled waste for the limitation, government would fail to recycle those materials. Therefore, carrying limitation on recycled waste is not a fair choice.
Admittedly, a minority of individuals tend to believe that the limitation of harmful waste would also cause citizens discard them everywhere. Nevertheless, if they could analyze this issue from a different perspective, they could find they have oversimplified the fact that the most essential method of solving problem above is limiting the use of the product which could make damage on the environment. Local government should focus on inventing much more product which is environment friendly. Only in this way, the problem of harmful waste could be solved comprehensively.
To sum up, the government is essential to distinct the kind of wastes. Impose limitation on harmful waste and encourage recycling. At the same time, spare no efforts on shifting harmful waste into environment friendly product. Only in this way could waste problem being successfully solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 16
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City s local newspaper In our region of Trillura the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend the city run public schools comes from taxes that each city government collect 58
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. Wr 50
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 50
- Asked what the most eager objective is to modern people while working, the response of almost all must be a boilerplate answer: the success. Although some people claim that for success in a future job, the ability to study hard in school is really counts, 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb mean is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'means'
Suggestion: means
...emporary are environment friendly. That is meaning they are designed to cause no damage or...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...emporary are environment friendly. That is meaning they are designed to cause no damage or...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, for instance, kind of, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32279909707 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91219660645 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48532731377 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3319186272 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2142857143 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8214285714 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239955782643 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719245916066 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044042695531 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153963282965 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377649914591 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.