The best way to teach a person is to praise the person’s positive actions and ignore negative actions..
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation
One’s style of teaching is usually based on one’s understanding of the human needs and response to actions, situations and or circumstances. The authors posits that the best way to each a person is to praise the person’s positive actions and ignore negative actions. The prompts claims that when positive actions are praised more often, it could have a better learning effect on the person. In my opinion. I strongly agree that praising good actions in people make them learn better. I feel this way for three reasons.
Firstly, celebrating good actions or little wins serve as a big motivation to encourage a person to do more. For example, a leader will be more motivated to do and bring about a lot more of development when he hears his subordinates genuinely telling him of the good he has done. Consequently an individual thriving hard to excel will be more motivated when he/she is applauded by what feat he/she has achieved, no matter how small. This example illustrates that one will learn better when applauded for one’s positive actions.
Secondly, everyone loves to be rewarded. Studies have proved that reward is one of the factor that keeps people going. It is one reason a lot of people have suffered long, because they look forward to their rewards at the end. For instance, praising one for one’s positive actions could be the only reward one is looking up to. It could be one’s source of hope. They have been cases of children quickly running and assisting parents with tasks/chores because they believe they’d be rewarded with praises afterwards. Moreover, rewards serve as a fuel to a tired engine. This analysis demonstrates that praising for positive actions is a better way of teaching.
Finally, being used as good example is a good feeling everyone wishes for. For istance, a student will most likely perform better in academics because he is conatantly being used to set a good example for his mate, because he/her positive actions is mostly talked about! This simple example sjows that good praise is a good motivator and teaching tool.
In conclusion, one may decide to scold or angrily rebuke a negative action as a means of teaching. However, in present and even old times, we have seen persons go into depression instead of learning, people go into depression because their wrongs were talked abiut or openly rebuked. I believed a better way of teaching is by praising the positives actions intead, one will definite learn when oly his/her positibve actions are being praised.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-06 | Obasi Emmanuel | 58 | view |
- The best way to teach a person is to praise the person s positive actions and ignore negative actions Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted resul 58
- Issue Topic The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...yle of teaching is usually based on one’s understanding of the human needs and response to acti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'posit'.
Suggestion: posit
...tions and or circumstances. The authors posits that the best way to each a person is t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
...nd ignore negative actions. The prompts claims that when positive actions are praised ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... good actions in people make them learn better. I feel this way for three reasons. Fi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...ly telling him of the good he has done. Consequently an individual thriving hard to excel wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...example illustrates that one will learn better when applauded for one’s positive actio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95518867925 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60500274344 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.1555829964 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.347826087 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4347826087 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69565217391 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257055813436 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841455672721 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089019669878 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16290839165 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985800397923 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.