The writer of the issue states that the most effective way of teaching is to admire students by their good acts and disregard bad ones. Some people might argue that this behavior is not really effective in teaching. However, as far as I am concerned, I should say that this procedure is advantageous because it can bring benefits to both teachers and students.
Acclaiming learners whenever their performance is positive is one of the best methods of teaching. Sometimes people suffer from a lack of confidence, and in some cases, they feel that they are not being taken seriously so that it affects their performance and reduces their efficiency. However, by praising the audience whenever they act positive or when they respond well, teachers could convey a good feeling which could grow a sense of self-satisfaction in the one audience and consequently results in a higher self-confident in that person. This will lead to a better response in the class and would encourage people to try their best in order to experience this good feeling again, besides, they might view this commend as a reward and try to achieve it another time to fulfill their sense of satisfaction. In other words, they would make more effort thus they would become better learners and more eager to the course and subjects.
Similarly, ignoring unfavorable acts is also a beneficial method of teaching. What ignoring the wrong behavior would do is that it would give time to the one person to think about their behavior and correct themselves consciously. Moreover, this ignorance would definitely keep the aura of the class clean and peaceful which is necessary for both teaching and learning tasks. In addition, not mentioning bad behavior would lessen its importance and avoid learners from repeating it just because of attracting attention. In contrast, a strict action from the teacher would distract the learners’ attention away so that the atmosphere of the class will be disturbed for a few minutes and it would take time for the learners to get back on the track. So, that is why instructors shouldn't behave strictly in this kind of situation.
In conclusion, to my way of thinking, it would be a good way of teaching if teachers acclaim favorable acts and ignore unfavorable ones. Using these techniques would actually provide a good atmosphere in which teachers can improve their interactions with learners so that instructors could convey the instructions better and learners could perceive the concept more clearly.
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 55
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, however, if, moreover, really, similarly, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04057279236 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82792361761 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484486873508 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4976036807 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1875 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.21951772744 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127894683595 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497372845977 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06963682708 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837333700988 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297676858897 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.