The author, in the given prompt, asserts that the best way to one is to commend one's good actions while ignoring their faults. I personally agree with the author’s former, while disagreeing with the latter part of his or her assertion. In the next three paragraphs, I will explain the reasons for standing in such a dual position.
First, it is certain that expressing commendation is, of course, a good way to teach and support one who is doing well. Praising one’s good actions motives him or her to do another good. For instance, If a student helps his friend in doing homework, or a random people help, say, a blind to cross the street and gets admiration and support for their benevolent work, that student or that random pedestrian will be motivated to do more of good works in the future. If they do not get the appreciation they deserve, they might lose their interest in furthering their good works. In this sense, I do agree with the author that appreciation is a way of teaching.
However, ignoring one’s faults cannot be a way to teach him or her. Consider a child, he or she has little idea of what is good, what is bad. If his parents or guardians do not correct their child’s bad actions, he or she will never know that his or her actions do not appear to be good, or he or she should try to avoid those works to be a better person. Ignoring bad actions, while appreciating goods, is just half part of the job.
Moreover, there are more extreme cases where ignoring one’s faults or bad actions is a suicidal action. In fact, sometimes even criticizing one’s actions is needed. For instance, suppose a manager or a worker at a certain organization does a terrible thing that causes the organization to face loss at the end of the year. So, can ignoring his or her faults be a way to teach him or her now? I certainly do not think so. In such a case it more effective, for the organization or for the society as a whole, to teach him or her by correcting his or her faults, and even maybe by admonishing him or her to an extent so that he or she works carefully in the future.
In sum, though appreciation as a response of a good action is a is somewhat compulsory in teaching and furthering good works, a certain level of criticism and correction against a bad action is also needed for the betterment of an individual, and of, broadly, the nation, while ignoring negative or bad actions will result in no good.
- Investments in life saving technology are more valuable than investments in technology related to entertainment or luxury 50
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 57
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation 039 s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enroll 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ation as a response of a good action is a is somewhat compulsory in teaching and ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48098434004 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63278552857 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458612975391 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7119120312 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.421052632 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252658766905 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943409426697 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102114432296 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149799834602 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288387729342 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.