Not surprisingly, the education and its best way that should be adopted to have a maximum productivity, have always been the cornerstone of every human society. Different people harbor different perception toward this subject. Some people are of the opinion that due to this fact that students are really sensitive to the teachers' way of teaching, it is better to praise them and rear them in supportive manner whereas some have advocated that students punishment is regarded as a good alternative for correcting them. I agree with former view that praising positive can be acted as main impetus for students' bringing up process based on the following discussion.
The first point springs to mind is that most children-even people- better response to extol. In fact, the main reason which teacher should be treated as motivator is that applauses always seems more alluring to us. To illustrate this point, it should be noted that if any individuals have been praised, the overall of that person's results can be more satisfying and the productivity will be boosted. For example, a friend of mine in primary school was a shy person. However, he did all the assignments with lots of care but as he could not express himself comprehensively. Hence, most of the time he was exposed to the teacher criticism and this point made the situation more worsen and caused him more lack of confident. Fortunately, the next year we had an energetic and incentive teacher who helped my friend to stand on his own feet and recently, by successive applauses he has become a successful person in his new enterprise. As matter of fact, if that teacher did not extol him enough that caused him to find himself, he might stay in a negative loop-more punishment and more wrong activity for his rest of life. Furthermore, when a teacher esteems ones' characteristic and exalt ones' ability, most of the students try hard to show that the teacher might not be wrong for his first assessment and continuously his pupils show their effort to prove themselves in front of teacher's eyes. In essence, there is clearly perceived that the teacher can play a critical role in one's future success by adoring children's even minor positive points.
On the other hand, being exposed to the harsh environment with full of negative criticizing might be accompanied by the detrimental consequences. First, if children think that they have a meticulous teacher who might not ignore their minor mistakes, there is no doubt that their creativity and innovation might have been hindered. For instance, being in philosophy course, any individuals must take part in the free discussion for expressing their particular and distinctive ideas in order to have a conclusive and convincing conclusion. Given this situation that the instructor might always correct them or punish them for any wrong statement, gradually most of students become indifferent to the learning process, however, if the teacher motivates them to express themselves, there would be a proper didactics environment which most of the students can learn something new and useful. Not surprisingly, being strict to the student's blunder surpass their ability and deteriorate their characteristics.
From what have been discussed, the teacher should have act like a motivator which means that he must be patient with students' mistakes and instead praise minor achievements. In this way, the didactic environment can be flourishing and useful with lots of successful students.
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 76
- The following appeared in a letter from a department chairperson to the president of Pierce University. "Some studies conducted by Bronston College, which is also located in a small town, reveal that both male and female professors are happier living in 66
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 86
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 73
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...manner whereas some have advocated that students punishment is regarded as a good altern...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1157, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...fe. Furthermore, when a teacher esteems ones characteristic and exalt ones ability, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1187, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...r esteems ones characteristic and exalt ones ability, most of the students try hard ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1477, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...the teacher can play a critical role in ones future success by adoring childrens eve...
^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...them for any wrong statement, gradually most of students become indifferent to the learning proc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'whereas', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'no doubt', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213247172859 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.166397415186 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113085621971 0.0880659088768 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0436187399031 0.0497285424764 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0613893376414 0.0444667217837 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.117932148627 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0500807754443 0.0406280797675 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8763670188 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0290791599354 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0016155088853 0.0016655270985 97% => OK
Determiners: 0.0904684975767 0.0997080785238 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.032310177706 0.0249443105267 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0145395799677 0.0148568991511 98% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3501.0 2732.02544248 128% => OK
No of words: 570.0 452.878318584 126% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14210526316 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361403508772 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285964912281 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212280701754 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149122807018 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8763670188 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 219.290929204 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 62.7075905215 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 27.1428571429 23.380412469 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2567691076 59.4972553346 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.714285714 141.124799967 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 23.380412469 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 55.7393483709 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.40476190476 1.64882698954 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321942930882 0.391690518653 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0822497160031 0.123202303941 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0493866939122 0.077325440228 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480732636219 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150909573142 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118999414327 0.161403998019 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065604592094 0.0892212321368 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.42781463682 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.072353553415 0.0692045440612 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215879841097 0.275328986314 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590881590604 0.0653680567796 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum three arguments wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.