The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The statement states that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. First, to write on this issue we must know that what is the most favorable and effective way to teach our children? Well, children’s or any learner’s growth depends upon the response they receive from their teachers. Positive response leads to positive feelings associated with a particular action, and negative response leads to negative feelings associated with a particular action. I concede that praise positive actions is really a best approach to teach. However, I believe a teacher should never ignore the negative actions. Therefore, I disagree with this statement at some extent.
Teaching is exigency in children’s life to gain knowledge and involve good habits. Children are at their growing age in school. It is important that along with appreciating their good actions parents are told about the places where they are wrong. For example, a child may be brilliant in study and may get good scores in all subjects. However, he/she is can’t chat friendly and politely with other students. Here it is not only important to encourage the child to do well in academic but it is very important to teach him how to behave with others. If child doesn’t change their rudely behavior at that time, hereafter he/she will grow up to be an unfriendly person who is not accepted in the society.
Moreover, home is the first school of the children. The children have no knowledge about what is right or wrong. They pick up whatever see around them. This may be good or bad. It is a parents responsibility to check where their children are wrong. The children are under observation of educators for fixed hours. Therefore, the responsibility of a parent to observe the actions of their children.
If the activities of children go on the wrong side, then there is a responsibility of the parents that it is done properly.
However, If the employees done their work with enthusiastic and perfectly, they deserve praise for their work. This will become employees more confident and enthusiastic. But if employees get praise more than they deserve, it will cause their losses. On the other hand, it is possible that employees take wrong decision at some time, instead of ignoring the mistakes employer must help them to come to the right decision. This will help in the get success of the individual as well as employer.
In the end, I think appraising positive actions is surely a way of teaching but it doesn’t mean that neglect negative actions.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the results of an airline survey in 2011 of economy class male and female travellers of different ages The numbers show which groups ranked particular in flight features as the most impo 78
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... that praise positive actions is really a best approach to teach. However, I beli...
^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
... them. This may be good or bad. It is a parents responsibility to check where their chi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to praise'
Suggestion: to praise
...nthusiastic and perfectly, they deserve praise for their work. This will become employ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mistakes'' or 'mistake's'?
Suggestion: mistakes'; mistake's
...n at some time, instead of ignoring the mistakes employer must help them to come to the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the individual as well as employer. In the end, I think appraising positive ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;t mean that neglect negative actions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99303944316 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80263632621 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480278422274 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0444825574 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8571428571 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3928571429 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293357577137 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830879400016 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174246747956 0.0758088955206 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153642360661 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186726352076 0.0667264976115 280% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.