Teaching in a right way is a very debatable issues that how it brings a fruitfull result, praising or not? Which should be effective for doing good next time? Persceptions differ from person to person to teach something someone. Always praising or vice-versa never our expectaion reveals the best way of teaching form. Therefore, it is too far to say that biasness for praising always makes good initiaties for everyone in everywhere.
If studetns are highly appreciated by teachers for their good jobs, it is really helpful to them make another good result. For example, at science fair in our school, our group displayed how lemon juice use for creating electric volt. By joining 4 or 5 lemon with wire adding an ammeter, it shows volt. For this project our teacher really apreciated us doing this. This might very helpful to us for further achievement. Next time we took initiatives for making robot. We never dare to do such type of work without teacher's praise.
A nation's important decisions are taken by it's government which is very sensitive issues beacuase public benefits involve there. A small mistake can cause a big suffer. Sometimes government take steps for own interest subtly whether general people never claim him/her. These types of tricky movement always judge by people and force to discontinue his/her power anymore. Public movements run against by political leader for their wrong movements. In this circumstance if people ingnore govt. faulty works, total system may corrupted for meeting own interest rather public benefits. Republican country must careful their leader steps in every movements. For example, constructing Padma Bridge in Bangladesh, by help of foreign aid which is denied further for huge corruption. In that times public have criticized government activities. Therefore, government take decision making their own fund to complete this task which recieve kudos by general people.
Some people always have around us like over-react every thing is common phenomenon to them. They actually never count anyone negative comments as well if any positive comments come then highlighted it too much. By covering their faults they only want to show their better works. Film actors or television celebrity always hide negative comments from public aghasting if it falls any negative impact their career rather highlight thier positive comments. It is their business strategy.
Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether anything positive or not. Like rural areas authorty wants to make shopping complex in this site. Some people take it positively some give negative opinions. This policy raises controversial opinion that is it useful or not? In some views shopping complex might have an indicator of development. Other might veto this proposal for less population in rural site. Public demand analysis may solve this problem. Not only accounting good initiatives but also analyze its sustainabilty should help to take perfect decision.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 66
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer 80
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explor 80
- 13. In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway p 53
- "Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little impact on our customers. In fact, only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indica 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
Teaching in a right way is a very debatable issues that how it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'person to'.
Suggestion: person to
...ood next time? Persceptions differ from person to person to teach something someone. Always praisin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: A nation; Nations
...pe of work without teachers praise. A nations important decisions are taken by its go...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'discontinuing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: discontinuing
...vement always judge by people and force to discontinue his/her power anymore. Public movements...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The word 'anyone' in subjunctive clause must be used with a base form of a verb: 'negative'.
Suggestion: negative
... them. They actually never count anyone negative comments as well if any positive commen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33050847458 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61338331202 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8468438868 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.8888888889 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1111111111 23.4991977007 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10663562184 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252984443219 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558377462135 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708395106369 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076794368951 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.