The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching is considered one of the most noble professions since time immemorial. Over the ages it has evolved to be an intricate profession with emphasis being given to various nuances of teaching. The best way to teach has been a point of considerable debate. Here, the author mentions praising positive actions only while ignoring the negative ones to be the best way to teach.
I disagree mostly with the author's standpoint from multiple perspectives. Firstly, ignoring completely the negative actions leads to an obscured judgement. Negative actions are meant to tone down the degree of positivity of a teacher's judgement. Secondly, negative actions provide vital clues to the weaknesses of the student. Ignoring them will only exacerbate the weaknesses of student.
However in some cases, adopting the author's viewpoint is going to benefit the effects of teaching. For example, minor mistakes which are caused due to negligence or lack of attention can very well be ignored as they can be worked on anytime with satisfactory results. Next, reducing the morale of student while learning is unwarranted for. Since, a low morale directly contributes to lack of learning efficiency.
Thus in considering the author's viewpoint, I would suggest to ignore only those negative actions which has little effect on the student's overall performance. While the more prominent ones should be highlighted and given due importance in evaluating a student's potential. The real key to the best way to teach lies in properly weighing the pros and cons of ignoring any negative action and undertaking appropriate steps to inform the student about it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | Faisal Injamam | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | rkalita8 | 33 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | swathi3pet | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | sunandaroy | 50 | view |
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 33
- "Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of national security. "Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your position, you should con 50
- "The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 50
- We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for a shampoo company. Since the 43
- The following is from a recent email by the diord corp. Human resources manager. "TObor technologies found that mental health problems and mental illness were responsible for about 15 percent of employee sick as they do for physical illness. In addit 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...to teach. I disagree mostly with the authors standpoint from multiple perspectives. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...tone down the degree of positivity of a teachers judgement. Secondly, negative actions p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...xacerbate the weaknesses of student. However in some cases, adopting the authors vie...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... However in some cases, adopting the authors viewpoint is going to benefit the effec...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...utes to lack of learning efficiency. Thus in considering the authors viewpoint, I...
^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... efficiency. Thus in considering the authors viewpoint, I would suggest to ignore on...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest ignoring'.
Suggestion: suggest ignoring
...sidering the authors viewpoint, I would suggest to ignore only those negative actions which has l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 261.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29885057471 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85761089347 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6299058148 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4375 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211881452106 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689734088998 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604687689419 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128028879216 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378429922057 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.