Education is the fuel for our future generations, and how we teach them is the flame that ignites that a conflagration. To teach in a way that encourages students to be wrong at times not only helps the students to learn from their mistake but also helps the teacher to whet the skills of students to help them achieve the most of it. Although this type of teaching bring about surfeit amount of good there are several factors that stymie the comely appearance of the system which can certainly not be ignored while discussing this subject. By expressing views on this topic we can understand a lot that is wrong and can be corrected in our current education system.
Firstly, in an education system where positive actions are encouraged individuals tend to be motived to achieve, they stride in order to learn what truly aspects that inspire them in the first place. The monotony of uninteresting topics which holds a great virtue in the minds of pupils stops to exist, which indeed creates a plethora of learning opportunities in a facade of errors. A student not interested in studying maths will surely hate the subject if he or she is under a constant scrutiny of a teacher, whereas the the same student won’t mind to be appreciated every once in a while for the few questions he did manage to get right. Although time consuming one can definitely expect extols for positive actions to yield great results in an overall development of student’s skills in the long run.
Secondly, one can speculate without a single spec of doubt that a system where a teacher lauds its pupils can never be an effort in vain. There is a huge role that the teacher plays to establish such a system, but these effort pay back in copious amounts to both the student and the teacher. It helps a teacher to recognise talents way before an individual is put to a test and helps the student to hone those skills which they love fervidly. We can agree if Mozart was castigated every time he failed in his incipient stage of his learning the piano, causing a deep seated resentment for music, we would have never had his symphonies to relish today.
Though the system repletes with propitious outcomes one can not ignore the fact that the system has still a long way to go before actually being implemented by the masses. The major flaw that will be observed is that the students would be taking an undue advantage of the situation. Without the fear of being reprimanded for their actions they would resort to a much more casual approach towards education in general. Moreover an earnest teacher with the patients to put in these efforts is a hard find in this modern era and even if we do find someone, with the abundance of students it is really difficult to have individual attention for all of them even by this incredulous teacher. Which leave us thinking wether or not this strategy is viable on large scale.
In conclusion a system with emphasis on encouraging errors is definitely something that is our current education pattern should incorporate, but to resolve all the limitations should be the first priority in-order to get a unimpeded growth of all students, especially those individuals possessing profound talents.
- "On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts to help them achieve the most of it. Although this type of teaching bring about surfe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...constant scrutiny of a teacher, whereas the the same student won't mind to be appr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...constant scrutiny of a teacher, whereas the the same student won't mind to be appr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this effort' or 'these efforts'?
Suggestion: this effort; these efforts
...r plays to establish such a system, but these effort pay back in copious amounts to both the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...had his symphonies to relish today. Though the system repletes with propitious out...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... approach towards education in general. Moreover an earnest teacher with the patients to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d be the first priority in-order to get a unimpeded growth of all students, espec...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, while, in conclusion, in general, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2672.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 559.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77996422182 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65163954875 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509838998211 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3156704879 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.444444444 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0555555556 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10827418686 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385782692453 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277728215791 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0616511156875 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322321437872 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.