The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The characterstics of a society can never be defined by sole heros. Society represents millions of people. To generalise characterstics of any society one will have to look for their common general behavior. People live different lives, everyone has had a different day, it completely depends on them how they react to any particular situation. There are several more reasons supporting that one should not judge a society on basis of nature of their rolemodels or heros.
To begin with, one man can never represent whole society. Different bringing up teach unique morals, some by examples some by experiences, but these morals result in people having different habits. Take for an example an army officer who is a war hero, he may be very disciplined and fit, also he may have a habit of drinking alcohol in little quantity every day. This should not be used to generalise that most of the soldiers have the same habits. Few may have boycotted alcohol and others might have given up on fitness or discipline.
Also, it depends on several circumstances that made one the hero. Heros are never born, they are made from various decisions they took which resulted in betterment of society. Few rolemodels may be only whistle blowers while others revolutionary scientists. Similarly, popular sports person and actors are known for their skills. The point is that there is versatility every where, therefore it is wrong to infer that rolemodel's characterstics can define a society's charachters. Take for an example, we cannot say that most of the North America behaves the way Mr.Snowden does and uses a blanket to cover their screen while using computers.
Moreover, it is their work that has made them hero not their characterstics. No hero have ever been chosen for display of his ideal characterstics. Its not charactersitcs that make a hero, its attitude which forces one to not give up on the characterstics that define him. If Donal Trump had given up on what he stands for, he might have never gotten elected as president of USA. People never support any particular person, they support what that person represents.
However, heros does define the trends that will be followed. All of us have observed that people tend to follow characterstics of their heros. Once in while media showcases the personality that these heros had and inspires the nation to follow on good aspects of these hero's lives. One such example is Sachin Tendulkar of India. He is named god of circket. Very frequently you will encounter television shows that recapitulate the determination and good qualities he had.
Conclusively, society is a mix of all peoples so should be the way to evaluate it. If one is to judge the nature of any society, he should become a part of it, try to see things the way people in that society see, may be for a small period but it can give very useful insights.
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial.to what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.Write a response in which you 58
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp 50
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: Little may
...t of the soldiers have the same habits. Few may have boycotted alcohol and others might...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...utionary scientists. Similarly, popular sports person and actors are known for their s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
... The point is that there is versatility every where, therefore it is wrong to infer that ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Snowden
...of the North America behaves the way Mr.Snowden does and uses a blanket to cover their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... hero not their characterstics. No hero have ever been chosen for display of his ide...
^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...or display of his ideal characterstics. Its not charactersitcs that make a hero, it...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2387.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87142857143 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77750603511 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508163265306 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0918980016 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3103448276 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8965517241 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13793103448 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120454797344 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035032485976 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421743819453 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711058187156 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347036209473 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.