Change, an essential phenomenon in human society, is opposed by a contrary saying "old is good". Thus, introduction of changes or new things or entities in the society has always been a tough time for mankind. The prompt suggests that in business, education and government, people should remain skeptical of new people and should continue to do so until those leaders prove their mettle. I mostly agree with the suggestion for two reasons which I will elucidate below. However, I do concede that in certain circumstances, the suggestion provided by the prompt is not very useful.
To begin with, being skeptical towards leaders initially, provides the people a better way to assess the merits and demerits of the leaders. Conclusions based on a short amount of observations can be deleterious. The true nature of the leaders may not be revealed in a short time if people start believing in them quickly. For example, whenever a ground breaking theory in any field of education comes out, it is met with obstruction from many scholars of that field. It is only after robust testing of the theory that the people begin to trust its validity and also the scholar who put forward the theory. Whenever a prediction of an investment pundit turns true, seasoned traders and investment bankers are initially doubtful about the reliability of the prediction, whether it was a reasoned prediction or just a random guess. Only after checking more predictions of the guru , do people begin investing as per his advice. Thus, showing hesitation towards a new figure in such fields, can prevent one from committing mistakes.
Second of all, change in leaders mostly occurs when the people are not satisfied by the current leaders. For example, people, angry at the inflation and reduction in the number of employment opportunities, might put a government out of power, thus deeming the requirement of a new leader and a government. It may happen that students are not satisfied by the quality of education provided by a teacher and want a new teacher to conduct the classes. In either case, there is a possibility of high expectations from those who have newly been introduced into the equation. If the people or the students are not careful initially in evaluating the new leader or teacher respectively, then there is a chance that the newly appointed will not care to ameliorate the condition of the people and will only increase the already high dissatisfaction in the people. This will not solve the problem of the people.
However, the action of people, not establishing faith in the newly appointed leaders might hurt the feelings of the leaders. They might not get the motivation to work harder and effectively for the well being of the people. This in itself is a bad omen for the field concerning the leader and eventually for the human society. A newly elected government might become prone to venality. The newly appointed teacher might not be putting all of his dedication in order to convey the knowledge to his students. Thus, in such circumstances, believing and having confidence in the leaders will be much better for the people.
Thus, I mostly agree with the prompt that people should remain sceptical of new leaders until the leaders prove that they are worthy of the people's trust. However, I do concede that in some cases the suggestion might not be helpful.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century old tradition of all female education and begin admitting men Pointing to other all female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 58
- While the department of education in the state of Attra recommends that high school students be assigned homework everyday the data from a recent statewide survey of high school math and science teachers give us reason to question the usefulness of daily 68
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In devel 62
- TPO 9 Integrated essay 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omenon in human society, is opposed by a contrary saying 'old is good'....
^^
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er checking more predictions of the guru , do people begin investing as per his ad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, so, then, thus, well, for example, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2825.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9735915493 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78244182541 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470070422535 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 872.1 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8724298512 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.62962963 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.037037037 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.51851851852 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188492053272 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049147431547 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593970632992 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123687820257 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587391364623 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.