Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is not eccentric to debate that in the world, which we live, giving powers for the leader in any fields such as business, political, and education for a long time is a controversial issue among people. While some people think that rulers in the cited positions had better altered with new ones, others believe that remaining leaders in the various enterprise like business, education, the government is a beneficent idea for these kinds of fields.in my view, I mostly agree with the latest statement because of two reasons.
First of all, preserving peoples who are in charge of leaders in the various fields is conducive to achieve the big goals in the future. That is, reaching to invaluable objects require to spend time, and altering the leaders frequently hinder them to planning for a long time. For instance, Sir Alex Ferguson, who was a couch of the Manchester United sucker team, guided this team for thirteen years. As he had long term goals such as developing new generation for the Manchester United team in future, winning in the following competitions, attracting more adherent, the team authorities wanted to preserve Sir Alex Ferguson for a long time, and they saw their logical decisions positive results.
Further, replacing new leaderships with the experienced ones is a not proficient idea for any field. To clarify this point, the leaderships require to have enough knowledge and experience to be successful in any field, and these items have been acquired by the leaders who are in charge for many years in any domains. In facts, refreshed leaders are at the beginning of their fields pathways, and they make a big mistake which brings the cost to their enterprise. On the other hand, knowing rulers are the people who collect enough information and experience during the time and saving them could save more cost and risky decision making for the enterprise. For instance, David Cameron who was the minister of the United Kingdom was replaced with Teresa May by before he could finish his presidential periods. Teresa may not convince United Kingdom people to vote in support of the “Brexit”-rules that enable the UK to be independent of European Union- because of lacking enough experience in the field od the political, she failed in her responsibility.
Although preserving leaders for a long time has its advantages for any files, there are some disadvantages to this issue. For instance, by extended periods of powers, the probability that leaders misuse their powers and position has been increased. In this scenario, some rulers convert to the dictators like Saddam Hossein who was the leader of Iraq for a three-decade and kills many of the innocent's peoples in Iraq and other countries such as Iran by imposing frustrating War between Iran and Iraq.
In brief, while some people think that replacing new old leaders with the new ones is rational idea since refreshed rulers have more energy and compassion about their fields, I disagree with this idea due to existing more knowledge and information among experienced leaders besides the preserving older leaders is an economical idea for the enterprises.
- The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to wide 87
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 66
- Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past 77
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
... reaching to invaluable objects require to spend time, and altering the leaders frequent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...team for thirteen years. As he had long term goals such as developing new generation...
^^^^
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...neration for the Manchester United team in future, winning in the following competitions,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, so, while, for instance, in brief, in fact, such as, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07307692308 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82594436224 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486538461538 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5627806117 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.875 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 23.4991977007 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15620152169 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640863685598 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545469607214 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094379144778 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496915826434 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.