Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
With the development of society, there has been a prevailing debate regarding the appropriate term duration for leaders in various fields. I would concur with the perspective that a five-year term would be apposite.
On one hand, people would be confused and chaos could be engendered if frequent changes take place in the leading offices. Normally when an accession happens, the policies and strategies would be redesigned. As a result, the time and energy devoted to the previous direction would be wasted. A higher overhead is also a possible outcome concerning the handing over of tasks and documents. Under the circumstances where the management team changes too quickly, clerks would be more concerned about keeping their job by observing every possible news than sincerely contributing to their work.
On the other hand, as mentioned in the topic, new leadership could be conducive by bringing refreshing ambitions towards the position. Consider the cases of political and judiciary leaders who have been reported as corrupted, it is alarming in how people could establish such a strong network during just a few years to trade justice impartiality for their own benefits. And many of them got away with the legal punishment under the cover of other powerful allies. Incidents like this could be forestalled if a long in-power term is prevented.
Moreover, a five-year term would be apt as a testing window for most policies, however revolutionary they are. Take the Roosevelt New Deal as an example, novel as it was, only a few years were needed to prove the efficacy of those regulations on the market. However, was Roosevelt given a shorter term of office, he might not have been able to successfully process the New Deal and stick with it until it worked. And a few more years in power could have corrupted his ambitions to pursue social improvement rather than his own interests.
Succinctly speaking, concerning all the above-mentioned rationales, I would champion the idea that leaders ought to step down after they had five years in power, due to the fact that neither a much longer nor a more brief duration would be benign.
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 72
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company."Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home 48
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 16
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07042253521 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80786720315 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597183098592 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1607715985 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0731576549664 0.243740707755 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248865206438 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221224108636 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0465486093244 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281781517585 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.