Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The people holding higher position in an enterprise play a vital role in shaping the future of the enterprise. It is the responsibility of the leaders to make sure that the institution is functioning effectively and that it is moving towards progress. For years, people are trying to come up with a process that can guarantee success for an institution. The given claim is also trying to achieve so by reasoning that the warranted path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Every enterprise or field has different needs and requirements. Bringing in new people to occupy higher positions after some interval of time might prove beneficial especially in a field like education where new leaders can bring in fresh perspectives and ideas. Education is a fast growing field. One thing that is seems necessary today might turn outdated or obsolete tomorrow. A new leader can help in keeping pace with changing needs.
On the contrary, there are fields where such frequent changes to the leadership positions might lead to instability. For example, business is a field where a leader having good experience and understanding of the enterprise can make better decisions for that institution. If the enterprise changes the leader in every five years then the new leader would need to have a full understanding of the business, functioning of the organisation and the people working for it. Changing leaders in such cases might prove to be a costly affair.
Though, achieving success though is one common goal for every enterprise but there is not a common path to it. There is no one formula for success that can be applied to every field. Every field develops and grows in its own ways with both its leaders and people contributing to its success.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 63
- \\\ 58
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 37
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d people contributing to its success.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00673400673 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88720882292 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511784511785 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7852474077 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9375 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219246466405 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754522410663 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781694926302 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137027112121 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621129115447 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.