Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
People who are in power are always seen as epitome of success, dedication, passion and perseverence. One must not forget that every successful professional was a newbie someday. A basic structure of any enterprise can be thought of as a pyramid; those who are at the top of the pyramid have few subordinates to follow their orders, and so on. Now, if we play with this structure by rearranging order of all delegates over a fixed period of time, it will not be much of a success as it seems to be.
In any field - business, politics, education or government - those in power have formulated certain policies and morals to be followed, on which the foundation of entire enterprise is built. If this arrangement is to be changed every 5 years, with changing leader, the fundamental policies and ettiquetes on which the enterprise is built may lost over the course of time; thereby beating the sole purpose of the company. For example, John is founder of company A, and he has a subordinate Alex. When John first founded a company, he made a set of rules to be followed strictly. Somehow, Alex, John's delegate, does not agree with few of the rules, but is working with John without any complaint. Once John steps down, and Alex comes in his position, he will obviously change the rules which he didn't agree with, thereby compromising basic principles of the company, which is harmful and may lead to chaos instead of success.
Any enterprise is rife with sycophants trying to please their boss with sweet and kind behaviour; such voracious people are a major threat to the company, as all they care about is power, and not the company or job or ennvironment they are working in. If we are to change the leadership in every five years, then there is a high chance that one of these greedy sycophant will come in power and might completely destroy the enterprise's reputation for his greed and lust for money.
As mentioned earlier, any enterprise reaches its apex with passion, dedication and hardwork of the leader. If one leader is doing extremely great in his reign, then it will be a huge loss of company if such a paragon personality has to step down after his 5 years of service. If he continues after 5 years, he will surely take the enterprise to great heights; otherwise, if next person who steps up as the leader does not satisfy his duties, then company will experience a downfall and it may take a brief period of time to recover from it.
It must be acknowledged that one leader ultimately has to step down someday, by giving his charge to his subordinate. This change of leadership opens up new ideas, new implementations and there is sufficient space for the growth of overall company. New leadership also means that one must learn from his superior's mistakes and has to be ready to avoid them in his tenure.
On the other hand, this new arrangement of leadership may disturb the working environment. For example, if any company changes its leaders every five years, then it might corrupt the spirit between peers. One would always want to stand out, in order to be nominated for the superior post; thereby increasing jealousy among coworkers and giving rise to politics, rumors, and cold wars, which is extremely harmful.
Finally, new leadership is not the best path to revitalize any enterprise as it has its own disadvantages. As long as the current leader is successful in his reign, one must not think of altering the authority as it will ultimately result in loss of company.
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 66
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss the ext 58
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 73
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or any other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 83
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing order of all delegates over a fixed period of time, it will not be much of a success as it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ill obviously change the rules which he didnt agree with, thereby compromising basic ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprises'' or 'enterprise's'?
Suggestion: enterprises'; enterprise's
... power and might completely destroy the enterprises reputation for his greed and lust for m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 507, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ence a downfall and it may take a brief period of time to recover from it. It must be ackn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, then, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2898.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 611.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74304418985 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69840378322 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47790507365 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 922.5 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0956775541 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5652173913 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211113329449 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677426840033 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532950542065 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110329361875 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231640063635 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.