Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In a current society, political issues are pivotal for a nation’s prosperity. Therefore, it is debatable whether having a new leadership and obligating the current people with the power to step down after a certain amount of years is beneficial for success. I agree with the claim that after five years, people who have power should step down. However, I disagree with the reason that the most definite way to success for any corporation is revitalizing through having a new leader.
First, having a new leader in five years is beneficial in the field of business. Take Theranos, for example. Theranos was a company that developed groundbreaking blood test technology. Elizabeth Holmes, who was a leader of that company was only nineteen years old by then which is remarkable that she made such a success at a young age. However, it turned out that she fabricated the test result to be successful, and everything turned out to be a false claim later. If the leader changed after five years, there would be a chance to make a change in the false claim. However, Holmes kept the power for a long time, which led to the collapse of the corporation.
Second, a society can gain more benefits by changing into a new leader after five years. Take Franklin Roosevelt, for example. Roosevelt was a U.S. president during an economic crisis, the Great Depression in the United States. After he became a leader of the nation, he made an effort to rehabilitate from such a crisis. He brought up the New Deal Plan, which helped the government overcome the problematic situation, successfully making the path to a nation’s thrive. If it were not for Roosevelt’s new leadership, there would not have been such a crisis. Therefore, it is crucial to have five years of qualifications in periods of leadership.
However, having a new leader is not always the best way that leads to revitalizing an enterprise. As it is crucial to change the power after a few years to prevent leaders from overusing the power, having new leaders does not ensure a society that will lead to the revitalization of a certain situation. Take Donald Trump, for example. He became the president of the United States after the five-year qualification of the previous president. However, he was not able to resolve the economic issues or societal issues in the U.S.
In summary, it is crucial to change into a new leader after five years to prevent leaders from overusing their power. However, it is not always the best way to recover from a crisis. The way that leads an enterprise prosperity is not just the presence of a new leader, but a person with moral ethics.
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 50
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lizing through having a new leader. First, having a new leader in five years...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the collapse of the corporation. Second, a society can gain more benefits...
^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ualifications in periods of leadership. However, having a new leader is not al...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic issues or societal issues in the U.S. In summary, it is crucial to change in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leader, but a person with moral ethics.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82599118943 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79090535671 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444933920705 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.882081865 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.64 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.16 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268962076672 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792794002007 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591294497699 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162408827403 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776284991013 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lizing through having a new leader. First, having a new leader in five years...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the collapse of the corporation. Second, a society can gain more benefits...
^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ualifications in periods of leadership. However, having a new leader is not al...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic issues or societal issues in the U.S. In summary, it is crucial to change in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leader, but a person with moral ethics.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82599118943 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79090535671 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444933920705 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.882081865 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.64 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.16 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268962076672 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792794002007 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591294497699 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162408827403 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776284991013 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.