While it is true that change is constant, and that changes are a part and parcel in life. It is not necessary that it has to be bought about at particular time intervals in any system.
Considering a famous scientist who has spent his entire life studying and understanding the complex fields of his study, it shall be a loss for the community if we were to forcefully stop him from conducting further researches and advances just because he has been doing it for the past five years. The five year limit set on a person to remain in power is certainly an arguable one.
while one can argue that in the political and government scenarios there has to be a constant change to ensure diversity and prevention of dictatorial ruling, but this is left with many loop holes. Since we do not know whether five years is an accurate period in which one could have done his part properly.
Further if we consider the example of Steve Jobs who had successful set up his company Apple and delivered to the world the macbook. If he were to be forced out after a five year period we may never would have the iphone, further it would not be justified to snatch his dream company from him just to incorporate new leadership, in stead of new leadership it is more important to ensure new researches carried out in his company, which can be possible with him staying as the head too.
We should ensure that there is development carried on continuously irrespective of the leadership involved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...power is certainly an arguable one. while one can argue that in the political and...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...him just to incorporate new leadership, in stead of new leadership it is more important to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61132075472 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62754800983 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.4464922487 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.777777778 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119672542641 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045993751858 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028012895435 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632446505439 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241266875113 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.