Nation’s cultural traditions are pecious legacy that should be cared about very properlty. I belive that in order to be preserved and generated they need commencurate amount of finance to cover the costs, but it is not a necessary reason for governments to be meticulous about.
I do understand that governments should be curious about the financial resources being duly allocated among major cities, but the cultural traditions are not the proper reason for it. The first reason for this incentive, I think, is the budgeting and financing. Every city makes a plan of future expenditures, and thus demands sufficient funding from the government. So, by making a detailed budget, all expances, included the costs of maintaining cultural legacy, the city provides with information needed for resource allocation. The only problem of the government is to ensure that there is no outflow of the financing.
I do not agree with the reason, mentioned in the task, because for a city to flourish, the need in preserving and developing nation’s cultural traditions may be not as significant for the modern life as the development of education system, the roads and communication systems, and so forth. The major cities are the representatives of a whole country and their development is essential for tourism. Nevertheless, the role of cultural traditions should not be dismissed.
Major cities are not essentially the carries of the cultural traditions, and therefore concentrating attention on this aspect of finance will lead to descrepancies from the other important parts. To understand the essence of the question, furher investigation into the diversity of a particular city should be lead.
To conclude, I would like to say that the claim is significantly important from the prospective of resource distribution , but the reason, mentioned in the task, is not the one that should lay under the explanation of the claim. However, nation’s cultural traditions should not be dismissed
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 57
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leaded', 'led'?
Suggestion: leaded; led
...iversity of a particular city should be lead. To conclude, I would like to say tha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the prospective of resource distribution , but the reason, mentioned in the task, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33544303797 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2102345068 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522151898734 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0114785937 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318733245588 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110089271349 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441214935293 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175098094975 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409532241528 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.