Being a hero depends on your personality and charisma, and as people get famous more spotlight is cast on their them by media, leading to the hero's being scrutinized. However, does this mean that the scrutiny will always lead to the hero's reputation being diminished? I believe not, since, the type of effect scrutiny has on someone depends on the action that is being scrutinized. Additionally, while media scrutiny is faced by all people that become famous it does not mean that it is no longer possible for society to regard a living being as a hero. For a person's reputation to be diminished their actions must be negative in some way.
Scrutiny from media can be misleading in many ways; however, this does not mean that the action being scrutinized is good or bad for their reputation. Let's take recent events with the movie star's Shah Rukh Kahn's son Aaryan Khan, who was caught with drugs on a cruise. Aaryan Khan's actions were bad for himself and his father leading to a lot of scrutiny from media and denting his famous father's reputation. While Shah Rukh Khan's was not involved himself, his upbringing of the child was judged and his status from hero hood questions. Contrast to this situation, in 2020 the actions of a Bollywood actor were scrutinized by media for being good; depicting him as a true hero for helping the poor during Covid. From these two scenarios we see that depending on the action the media scrutiny faced by someone may improve their reputation or diminish it. Of course just because there is scrutiny it does not mean that there is no one who can become a hero.
As aforementioned, scrutiny can be both positive and negative and the effect it has on someone's reputation depends on the person's actions. As we saw above, the Bollywood actor who was scrutinized for their impressive assistance to people during Covid did become a hero for the people. Even though each of their actions were questioned by media and read into, people were still considering the person a hero. Thus, it goes to show that even with scrutiny it is still possible to become a hero as it depends on their actions rather than the media's portrayal of the being.
Since a person's reputation is in the hands of media is is inevitable that they will face scrutiny for their actions; however, this does not mean that we can no longer have hero's in our society. Regarding someone a hero depends on their the type of actions they perform over the how media will show them to the public.
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 58
- The following appeared in a petition presented by Classen University students to the school s administration The purpose of higher education is to prepare the student for the future but Classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for 73
- We venerate loyalty to our schools employers institutions friends as a virtue Loyalty however can be at least as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one 58
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 68
- Several charitable organizations in Pleasantville provide opportunities for teenagers to engage in community service These organizations have a great need for volunteers but in recent years the number of teenage volunteers has significantly declined Th 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'heros'' or 'hero's'?
Suggestion: heros'; hero's
...at the scrutiny will always lead to the heros reputation being diminished? I believe ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 561, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... regard a living being as a hero. For a persons reputation to be diminished their actio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ed is good or bad for their reputation. Lets take recent events with the movie stars...
^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'someones'' or 'someone's'?
Suggestion: someones'; someone's
...e and negative and the effect it has on someones reputation depends on the persons actio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...dias portrayal of the being. Since a persons reputation is in the hands of media is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...ons reputation is in the hands of media is is inevitable that they will face scrutiny...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...r the type of actions they perform over the how media will show them to the public.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, regarding, so, still, thus, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.675 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47578249589 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1256549992 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.277777778 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232463933766 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969475876538 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572435237604 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171016506804 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507991734749 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.