Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author claims that laws are useless for dealing with issues in modern life. The writer further reasons that the rules are not capable of alteration of belief in people’s heart and mind. I fundamentally do not concur with the proposition. In what follows I will list my three reasons to cast doubt on the accuracy of this position.
The first reason which should be considered in the systematic pattern that shapes the modern society. It is obvious that modern society defines according to the list of rules and their interaction. In this case, every detail in modern life is also base on the code and cipher. Consequently, the ignorance of this effect of the laws at the modern life is analogs to the overlooking the axiom such as the rotation of the earth around the sun. For example, the traffics of the big cities are controlled by strict traffic rules. Otherwise, the drivers in hurry will kick any obstacles in their path and ignore all signs and lights to achieve their destination. Is it imaginable to having this type of modern lifestyle without any rules?! Of course not.
Another striking reason which gives adherence to my attitude is the role of laws as the benchmark and indicator of the descent from the indecent actions. Indeed, each norm in a society defines based on the statute which is the hallmark of moral from immoral actions. This feature of law defines the pattern for people to follow and face fewer mistakes. Consequently, it halts the appearance of more problems instead of being futile for dealing with. Besides, the person regardless of his moral belief can do any ill-tempered action. Thus, the law defines the barrier to stop these immoralities. A lucid instance of this fact is the law of ban over the owning the gun. Actually, the acerbate behavior between two individuals can end with disaster result such as the shooting each other with a gun. In this scenario, this statute and its prevention over the possessing the gun ceases this bad outcome.
Finally, the reason which the law is not effective to be against the heart and brain is really a shaky clue for supporting the claim. Since the human being during his life experiences the cycles of mutation in both aspects of mental and physical. By the sole consideration of mental enhancement, it occurs according to ideology forming based on the trend rules. Therefore, the individual during his variation gains this ideology. Furthermore, the flexible nature of the people lets him adapt the changes very quickly and easily. Therefore, the effectiveness of the laws over the brains and hearts is an unfounded fact.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons confirm the failure of the claim and its reasons. As the rule is the base of the modern life, the rule prevents the possible problem, and individual faces the mutation and possesses the flexibility for asserting the variation; the laws are effective in the modern society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Susmita Dey | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Dhruv_gre | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | tulipkatie | 58 | view |
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 40
- tpo 20.1 80
- Tpo-extra writing 3 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- ets.2 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... ban over the owning the gun. Actually, the acerbate behavior between two individuals can en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9014084507 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67185794928 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 16.0 4.99550561798 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.230666374 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227765281623 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599572735317 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527320371604 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135361376398 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256628595142 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.