Recently, there is a raising controversial issue of whether the law can solve most of the problems of the modern society or not. Indisputably, the law can enforce such regulations and establish a well working system and the society can benefit from it. Nevertheless, we can observe many societies struggling with enormous difficulties within a well-structured law system. Thus, I would agree the idea that the law cannot solve the problems of the modern society because it has no ability to alter peoples mind.
First of all, the perception of the society for problems can change over the time. I would like to point out that although the society could see some situations as a problem in past times, now these can be regarded as normal. To illustrate, let us look at the example of homosexual marriage. Obviously, we all know that the law prohibits such acts in many countries around the world. Consequently, it creates public unrest even violent demonstrations. However, these kind of prohibition laws were considered must in 50 years ago. Nowadays, the society believe that homosexual marriage should be allowed and it is an essential right which must be protected. As we see in this instance, it is pretty obvious that the legal system cannot alter people`s thoughts. Consequently, it does not solve this particular problem.
Admittedly, one can think that the legal system can solve the problems of the modern society by applying severe punishments and rules. Clearly, we can come up with many examples of countries which admire this way and indeed be successful. However, in some specific circumstances people have no choice but breaking rules and laws. We can say that one of the most desperate case for a human being is having no hope. Thus it is quite expected that society can give birth to problems despite the laws. That is to say that, although the dominant authority can put laws on society, people can still tend to be criminal as their minds are what were before the law.
In addition, I can say that the legal system can solve the problems in some specific situations. For instance, after the industrial revolution society had many difficulties in competition among individuals and firms. As the time passes, the governments regulate the most of the markets and build a concrete legal system for competition rules. Now, we have functioning law in resolving the disputes among firms and individuals in terms of competition. However, above argument does not constitute a sufficent support against my position. This is because, the benefits for certain areas cannot necessarily works for others. Hence, we have still problems that are not solve by law because people mind does not change.
In conclusion, I acknowledge that the legal system can solve the problems of the modern society regarding some particular areas. Nonetheless, I think that it cannot solve the majority part of the problems because it cannot alter people`s mind. In fact, this issue should be taken seriously and regarding the problems of the society, a more eclectic approach should be created instead of pure laws.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ociety or not. Indisputably, the law can enforce such regulations and establish a...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...t even violent demonstrations. However, these kind of prohibition laws were considered mus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...se for a human being is having no hope. Thus it is quite expected that society can g...
^^^^
Line 7, column 665, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
...ce, we have still problems that are not solve by law because people mind does not cha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, thus, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2615.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07766990291 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83027010745 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483495145631 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6450219331 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1724137931 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7586206897 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.24137931034 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304208751316 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873683972953 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609696835753 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198921799045 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381583818431 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.