Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Law, in simple and layman terms, can be defined as a set of rules and regulations which a responsible citizen should abide by, in order to maintain social dignity. Unquestionably there can be situations where law fails to adjudicate the victim or even the assailant. Morality comes into play in such situations. A law takes into consideration several use cases that happen within the society. But such use cases are myriad and consideration of all possible cases is not feasible for any human being and even for the committee that are responsible for writing laws. Depending on the severity of the situation, desperate measures are taken, not only by the security personnel but also by the law-makers. This can be bolstered by considering several instances in the history of mankind.
The world is aware of the Taj Mumbai attack of 26/11/2009, where only four Taliban terrorists capitulated one of India's most secured and landmark hotel and massacred more than two hundred innocent citizens which included foreigners as well. They also managed to murder more than forty security personnel of policemen and National Security Guards. After a three days of non-stop gun fight and bloodshed, finally the terrorists were captured by the National Security Guards. As per Indian Law, any terrorist should be terminated within twenty four hours of his/her capture. But the 26/11 terrorists were kept in jail for a long six years in the name of interrogation. People who lost their relatives or friends or family in 26/11 filed a case against the national defense forces, demanding immediate hanging of the terrorists. In this scenario, the court turned in favor of the defense forces, while hurting the emotions of the common people.
In another scenario in the capital of India, New Delhi, a 22-year girl was captured by four men at midnight, and was raped and murdered brutally. This was one of the most shocking and heart-breaking news in the history of Indian journalism. The victim's acquittance was also beaten up by the four attackers. Delhi police was quick and efficient enough to take the four into custody, but kept in jail for over eight years. The victim's parents and the entire nation demanded an immediate encounter or hanging of the attackers, but there were no repercussions from the Delhi High Court or even the Supreme Court of India.
In a recent scenario, a so-called lower caste girl was raped and murdered similarly by the members of the so-called upper-caste, in Uttar Pradesh, India. This also caught nation-wide attention of both media and public. Common people demanded immediate detention of the attackers, but the state police chose to remain silent and the decision came in favor of the upper-caste attackers. Clearly, dissoluteness of the police and law-makers turned the law against the common people.
On the contrary, in another recent event in the city of Hyderabad, India, where a 30-year old woman was captured, raped and burnt alive by five goons, the senior police official captured the attackers and killed them in an encounter. The policeman received accolades and appreciation from all over the country, but had to face severe enquiries from the law-makers. Fortunately, the countrymen were in support of the encounter and the law-makers did not have any other option than to vindicate him.
Without a doubt, it can be concluded that the shortcomings of the law and law-makers, are always taken advantage of. While common people are emotional and require immediate judgments on critical scenarios, the law takes years to pass a judgement be it in favor of the victims or against them. In several scenarios, these shortcoming and loopholes of the law are used against the innocents, and they suffer from loss of identity. Hence, many of today's challenges are not solvable by the law.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-27 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | 200suranjan | 69 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | Bidusik47 | 79 | view |
- Some people think that travelling alone is better while others prefer to be in a group when they travel Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving schools is the most important factor for the successful development of a country 73
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 534, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-four
...y terrorist should be terminated within twenty four hours of his/her capture. But the 26/11...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'victims'' or 'victim's'?
Suggestion: victims'; victim's
...n the history of Indian journalism. The victims acquittance was also beaten up by the f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'parent'.
Suggestion: parent
... jail for over eight years. The victims parents and the entire nation demanded an immed...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 316, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this shortcoming' or 'these shortcomings'?
Suggestion: this shortcoming; these shortcomings
... or against them. In several scenarios, these shortcoming and loopholes of the law are used again...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, similarly, so, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 38.0 14.8657303371 256% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3191.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 630.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06507936508 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00997013923 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77387889642 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 312.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1019.7 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2782425881 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.366666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119655959249 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340042973894 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370311681432 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653973379946 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477117023308 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.