Claim The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Reason The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you

Essay topics:

Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

What defines a great nation? This is a contentious issue and different people will have different opinion. Some suggest that the indicator of a great nation is the welfare of its entire people, while some believe that it is the achievements of rulers, artists or scientists that make a nation great. I opine the former viewpoint.
The achievement of great people cannot indicate the success of a nation, because they are just the elite of the country and therefore do not represent the whole nation. We know that politicians, artists and scientists are the rarely gifted genius. Their contribution, no matter how great, is iota compared to the contribution made by the working classes of the country. A country’s future is shaped by the overall achievement of its citizens and not a few geniuses. A country which cannot provide basic needs to satisfy its citizens is not a great country. The most outstanding example is Russia. Russia was blossomed with many great scientist like Shakarov, Landau and Zeldovich. However Russians, except a few, are living in the state of poverty, because of Marxism, Russians are ripped off of their fundamental right of speech, and all are living in the fear of KGB. Can we call this sort of a nation “great” just because it possesses awesome power in science?
Some may note the the achievements of great nation’s rulers, artists and scientists are greater, compared to the achievements of the same in the third world countries. They thus conclude that we should measure the greatness of a nation in terms of achievements of individuals, not the general welfare of its people. They have confused the cause and effect. The reason great nations such as US nourishes outstanding people is because the general welfare of its people is well taken care off. Arts and Science are activities that require great deal of effort and funds , without proper financial support from the public and the government , these activities are not continued. The fact that arts and science receive much public support in the west is because, the countries are already developed and can afford to allocate sum of funds for these fields. However, in developing countries, government needs to improve the standard of living, and hence cannot allocate extra funds for scientific investigations.
From the history of the world , we know that the achievements of politicians' cannot be an indicator for a nations greatness. For instance, China has had its fare share of great rulers, but their history is full of numerous sad episodes. If a country’s greatness is dependent on its ruler, then the country cannot be considered as ‘great’, because the rulers will keep changing. George Washington was a good president, but that doesn’t guarantee the legacy of America. What makes America powerful and what makes US admirable is it’s political system. The founding father’s of US were visionary heroes who designed the system so that the country’s prosperity does not depend on geniuses'. Without a good president, other parts of the democratic system can still function well and thus ensuring a smooth run.
To sum up, I believe that the success of a ntion should not be measured in terms of achievement of its elites. The welfare of its people should determine the greatness of a country. We should be proud of a country by looking at the way it treats its citizens and not because of a few handful geniuses' that it gives birth to.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-23 Zahid6400 50 view
2023-06-14 swetha_14r 58 view
2021-08-25 canushka_4 58 view
2021-07-09 me2mahesh 66 view
2021-03-05 peterlatz 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user canushka_4 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and not a few geniuses. A country which cannot provide basic needs to satisfy it...
^^
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...st like Shakarov, Landau and Zeldovich. However Russians, except a few, are living in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 888, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'sort of'.
Suggestion: sort of
...ng in the fear of KGB. Can we call this sort of a nation “great” just because it possesse...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'notes'.
Suggestion: notes
...ses awesome power in science? Some may note the the achievements of great nation’s ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...wesome power in science? Some may note the the achievements of great nation’s rulers, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...wesome power in science? Some may note the the achievements of great nation’s rulers, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t require great deal of effort and funds , without proper financial support from ...
^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...require great deal of effort and funds , without proper financial support from th...
^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pport from the public and the government , these activities are not continued. The...
^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...igations. From the history of the world , we know that the achievements of politi...
^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...oliticians cannot be an indicator for a nations greatness. For instance, China has had ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 527, Rule ID: IT_IS[22]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (short form of 'it is')?
Suggestion: its
...powerful and what makes US admirable is it’s political system. The founding father’s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 527, Rule ID: ITS_JJ_NNSNN[27]
Message: Did you mean 'its political system'?
Suggestion: its political system
...powerful and what makes US admirable is it’s political system. The founding father’s of US were visio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the greatness of a country. We should be proud of a country by looking at the way...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, therefore, third, thus, well, while, for instance, sort of, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2883.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 577.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99653379549 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78411228452 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478336221837 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 880.2 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8525346166 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36666666667 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334936707004 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880444650596 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901908059273 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203984327212 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646804190631 0.0667264976115 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.