There is always a controversial about whether all the faculty are required to spend their time outside the college for the sake of getting enough practical knowledge and benefit not only the students they imparted but also to themselves to be a well-rounded person. Though I agree partly that the implementing of the policy might help a given fraction of teachers in some measure of ameliorating their academic skills and acquire more relevant experiences, the potential risk cannot be fully ignored before making a proper judgment.
The threshold merit of the policy is that teachers can benefit from the course of working since the outside factory or other job positions will be more accentuate on the practical using of the technic, while class in school is more narrow and focus mainly on the foundation of the theoretical principles and the analyzing of the sophisticated laws and data. Subsequently, It can easily imagine that when the professor teaches the same content for several times, I am not denying that it will render the teacher opportunity to comprehend the imparted materials more thoroughly, the result of the monotonous teaching task will bored them and eventually the teacher losing their enthusiasm inevitably causes a drowsiness in class, hence no profound understanding is guarantee not to mention raising students’ interests about specific field. However, considering the progressing and innovative nature of the working, the profession will update their system of knowledge then adopt a more efficient method in class with pictures, stories, vivid examples, even the advanced technic not introduced in established textbook. In sum, the students will benefit dramatically from the combination of practicality imparted by the well-rounded professors and theories on text books which necessary for students to get a better shot in future job market.
Moreover, the implementing of policy will undoubtedly benefit the teachers themselves. Since we agree that an excellent teacher is not defined as those who only strict on the students' academic grades, but the people who are able to raise their interest , notice their inner specific desire of the knowledge and guide students when they are in a dilemma, Thus, after experiencing the unique working, they will be more confident about the world and give more insightful advise to their students. Additionally, the requirement of being a qualified university professor includes the assessment of their scientific research in their field, a practical experience access a more critical thinking about the existing theories and indisputable to lead a further progress in that field.
However, we cannot be blind to the fact that in some field of science, the suited working position is not existed or hard to participate. Consequently, the policy has its indefensible flaws. For example, the study of the application of nuclear resource which is the technic that using the neutron to strike on the heavy nuclei then transform the released energy into other energy forms. The government will be not possible to find a proper position for every nuclear professor. As for the orchestration of the schedule of the extra working and preparation process of teaching, we are not anticipated that the teachers immerse in the working and ignore their foundation needs of students.
In a nutshell, the policy has its certain merits, especially in raising the interests among students and guided them in a swift changing job market to find a proper and suitable jobs. Nevertheless, the priority should be given to how to avoid the hazard of wasting time and how to offset the detrimental factors by proper regulations of implementing the policy.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 83
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s the same content for several times, I am not denying that it will render the teacher opportu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'bore'
Suggestion: bore
...lt of the monotonous teaching task will bored them and eventually the teacher losing ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ple who are able to raise their interest , notice their inner specific desire of t...
^^
Line 7, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore their foundation needs of students. In a nutshell, the policy has its certai...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, while, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3131.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 590.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30677966102 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92848004997 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94672370455 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506779661017 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 980.1 704.065955056 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.596874957 60.3974514979 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.6875 118.986275619 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.875 23.4991977007 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151909799176 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513649792904 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352704244485 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876340166772 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402420362558 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 14.1392134831 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 48.8420337079 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 100.480337079 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.