All employers want to make their company more efficient than ever. One of the methods to improve productivity, which is asserted by the author, is routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence for reducing the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. However, the following essay will largely disagree with this action with the below reasons and examples.
Admittedly, monitoring e-mail written by all employees might enhance their productivity. E-emailing contains a change of opinions, decision-making, scheduling, or else. It could affect the company's sales, marketing, distribution, or other things related to profits and costs. Thus, in terms of an employee, it could be an excellent choice to monitor all e-mail and help their employee not to be involved the complex problems, such as lawsuits from customers.
However, although it might bring some benefits to the company, it also might bring many disadvantages to employees; thus, it could reduce the productivity. For example, if the employer starts monitoring all e-mail correspondence, some employees would not be easy to write and send the e-mail to their customers or co-workers because this action could make them feel "monitored" always. If the measure makes them hesitate to send an e-mail, it will bring forth the waste of resources such as time and system capacity (if they would use more formal language due to the monitoring than before.)
Moreover, the monitoring itself has several problems for employers. For monitoring all employee e-mail, it could not be conducted by just one person if there are more than at least five employees. Thus, paradoxically, it would waste their human resources for just monitoring all of their e-mail correspondence. Otherwise, employees who will be in charge of monitoring could to other more direct things related to their profits, such as setting the marketing strategies.
In sum, If the purpose of the action only aims for the improvement of productivity, it would be better not to monitor their employee's e-mail by wasting their human resources and time. Monitoring all e-mail has some merits for both employers and employees, but it will also bring more costs to both of them.
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton 58
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 70
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of 58
- Archaeologists have long thought that an artifact called the pemchint was used by Dodecan people solely as a musical instrument Pemchints consist of hollowed pieces of bone shell or wood that are tied together with long straps When whirled in the air the 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ld make them feel 'monitored' always. If the measure makes them hesitate to ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, at least, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29085872576 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02620137083 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481994459834 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6532421292 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378705854888 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132646262796 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112563735842 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238550626188 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762021132341 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.