The policy posits the idea of thorough periodic examination of all email correspondence of employees. The statement implies the significant possible effects of the action. It will ensure the protection of the company from legal complications, which is of prime importance and it will reduce the prodigal use of resources. Considering the positive outcomes, the policy seems to be a necessary step which will be beneficial for the company in a myriad number of ways. The constant monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence by the management team will safeguard the company from lawsuits, as well as it will improve the overall effective performance by ensuring optimum usage of resources.
Based on an article recently published in a daily, if the entire population on earth who have an e-mail id deleted the junk or spam mails, it will save up to trillion gigabytes of memory. The pivotal implication is that doing so it will reduce the emission of greenhouse effect gases to a considerable amount, thus mitigating the cause for global warming. The article and explanation sound hard to correlate with the environmental effect but it is a proven fact. Hence, apart from the individual benefits of the company, if actions are done as stated by the policy then it is contributing to the betterment of the environment.
The e-mail in association with an organisation will have a myriad number of junk/spam emails from all the registered sites. The chances of missing important information from the pool of e-mails are high. There have been incidents where the company had been in the verge of shutting down due to delay in response, not sticking to the exacting timeline. This can be considered as an individual's personal carelessness, but the large number of unread spam mails might have possibly been the reason for it. By proper monitoring company can delete the unwanted emails, or the best ways is to categorise them and move to different folders, clearly indicating the importance of each section.
The overall effort and resources it will take up for putting the policy into practice needs a great deal of attention. But with the advance technologies, the action of constant periodic monitoring and categorisation of e-mails can be automated. The initial effort will be huge but upon the establishment, the efforts needed will be very less. However, negative implication such as the privacy of the employees will be put into question. But when it comes to official e-mails, lucidity is the priority.
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you di 75
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- Argument task The following appeared in a petition presented by classen university students to the school s administration The purpose of higher studies is to prepare students for the future but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the 83
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...ing timeline. This can be considered as an individuals personal carelessness, but the large nu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, apart from, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10436893204 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9829721849 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538834951456 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0844685493 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.684210526 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244615000333 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691521009038 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696920712821 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140760915197 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852220780304 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.