Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I totally agree with the given claim that the critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that fiend. I am a great fan of specialization and strongly believe that only those who has good cognizance in a particular field should comment or judge a pertinent work.
People usually have a tendency to comment or act nosy even in task or field not related to them. When a group of friends or family members gather, they usually find a topic to banter and comment about. This is normally ok up to the level of witty talks and short term banters. However, sometimes people tend to get little more critical and polemic regarding some issue which should have been left untouched. It might even have negative impact on another person or outcome of that particular task. Unwanted negative criticism might let any person down and can make lose interest.
For instance, usually when a young couple construct a house in rural area, the neighbor are very keen to observe closely and give their inputs. Some of them are extra harsh or critical and start commenting about the structural and architectural aspect of the house, which they have little knowledge about. This might sometime play a negative role in the well being of the owner and even encourage to alter the design aspect of the house. However, in the same situation, if the comment is from a qualified structural Engineer or, utility Engineer, the owner must be aware enough to contemplate the suggestions and comments. Those comments might well prove helpful to improve the house structurally or maybe some other improvement in utilities.
Similarly, we have watched many Soccer and other games in TV. As an audience, it really annoys me when I see the unqualified people and even the commentators commenting harshly on the game play and moves of the players. It is fine to get enthusiastic but the unnecessary and acerbic comments on the players sometimes affect them in negative way and might even hamper their following performances. On contrary, if the comments are constructive and from the experts who understand the game plays properly, the players and manager can take them in positive way and use it as fuel to perform better in following games.
However, in some case, it is not totally wrong to allow layman and non-experts to voice their thoughts. This can help to acquire a general overview of how the general people understand the particular task. The major factor is, the effect of the comments must not be negative. If from the expert, the comments must be taken in constructive way. Also, if the comments are from the non-expert group or the people who knows very little about that task, the person assigned to complete that task should either neglect it or take it lightly such that the performance is not affected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | reeya kiran | 50 | view |
- When Stanley Park first opened it was the largest most heavily used public park in town It is still the largest park but it is no longer heavily used Video cameras mounted in the park s parking lots last month revealed the park s drop in popularity the re 83
- The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company s president In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their wo 60
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 83
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of fami 58
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'altering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: altering
...l being of the owner and even encourage to alter the design aspect of the house. However...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, regarding, similarly, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82653061224 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5890592542 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504081632653 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9795281757 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163300960222 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049800890116 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103202099115 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11897430037 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133286802577 0.0667264976115 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.