Critical judgement is one of the pivotal reasons for the growth of an individual in any field, which would bolster your confidence. People have always been intrigued to analyze that how the constructive criticism from the veteran of the particular field help to pave your path easily rather than coming from a someone who is a abecedarian. I concur with the statement which states that critical judgement weighs more value when it comes from the expert of that particular field. To what follows I'd elucidate my point further.
At the outset, there are bounteous reasons why one should be reminded where they are going wrong in their respective field. This would definitely make one more ebullient and less perplexed for the imminent consequences. For example, if you are doing a survey road construction in your country then you need to take a support from your seniors because this is a very crucial matter which must be very pellucid. For that matter, if you make any mistake or didn't get a suggestion from the expert of the field then you might be considered trivial from the next time. So, it is never about valuing less from the other person than the expert of that field, it's just assert that they have experienced things first hand which would help to present better in any field.
In addition to that, Critical judgment from a layperson is often regarded as prejudiced as they will give you suggestions on the basis of what they have heard. In other words, if you are not a expert of that particular field than you would present the ideas and support someone according to their convenience and favoritism. For instance, if you are in the field of the politics and you get suggestion from someone who is only interested in politics then you would be quite reluctant to take that suggestion instead you'll take advice from the one who's been working as politicians since decades because their words would be more potent. Moreover, constructive criticism from the one in the higher position will be also help you to focus more in the work and learn from the past mistake of yours
To rebuttal, I concord with the certain statement as it helps one to open their eyes and do the work enthusiastically and be more incognizant about the consequences that will come along the way.
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals quot In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 77
- An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Meria where fish consumption is very high people visit the doctor only once or twice per 63
- Should your government place a tax on the junk food and fatty snacks 75
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 55
- If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: a; someone
...our path easily rather than coming from a someone who is a abecedarian. I concur with the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ather than coming from a someone who is a abecedarian. I concur with the statemen...
^
Line 1, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
... that particular field. To what follows Id elucidate my point further. At the out...
^^
Line 2, column 454, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...that matter, if you make any mistake or didnt get a suggestion from the expert of the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e heard. In other words, if you are not a expert of that particular field than yo...
^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The word 'someone' in subjunctive clause must be used with a base form of a verb: 'accord'.
Suggestion: accord
...d present the ideas and support someone according to their convenience and favoritism. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you'll
...luctant to take that suggestion instead youll take advice from the one whos been work...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
... instead youll take advice from the one whos been working as politicians since decad...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76262626263 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56764418357 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487373737374 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2074648326 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.076923077 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4615384615 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359570766274 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139532687581 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787113986306 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217195596607 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959413344948 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.