Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for government to spend money on building modern housing than on preserving historic or traditional buildings and homes

Buildings are the indispensable part of our city. The architecture of building shows whether the city is modern or historic. A quick reflection on typical day reveals that buildings has always been one of the prominent topic in contemporary discussions. People are always intrigued to analyze whether government should spend money on building modern houses than on preserving the old ones. I certainly believe that constructing new houses will bring different kind of charm in the city. In what follows I will elaborate my perception.
At the outset there are myriad of reasons, why disbursal of money by government in building modern houses is beneficial. One of the most important reason is it will provide employment opportunity for people. We all know that, for building new houses it’ll require brobdingnagian amount of labor. In a way, it will indirectly help people for fulfilling basic needs for their life. So, spending money on constructing modern houses will help in the overall betterment of society.
Likewise, in order to make new houses it requires lot of new materials which will also help in the increment of import export business. It will also help to create good bond with the other countries of world. For instance, in our country there is no high quality of cement so government should import that from India and since India needs tea, and one of the best kind of tea grows in Nepal, import and exports grows dramatically.
On contrary, historic and traditional buildings are the pivotal reason for the development of tourism industry. Many tourists from different part of world visit in the particular country in order to cherish and enjoy the beauty of historical monuments. While this is one of the important case, we can’t be blind towards the fact that renovation of such monuments requires huge amount. Hence, disbursal of money by government in building new houses has more significance.
Based on the argument above, I believe that though preserving the historic houses should be considered as well, however building modern houses not only enhance beauty of the city but provide employment opportunities for people.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, so, well, while, for instance, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14245014245 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81906492521 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527065527066 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1475552575 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33953429762 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109516636019 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881110335395 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19293658528 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078224523953 0.0645574589148 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.