Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The topic raises the controversial issue of critical judgement. Critical judgement is a judicious decision who is given by analyzing the issue, its pros and cons, its effects, and others. Moreover, it can be given by an individual, an organization, a group etc. Indisputably, when a decision is made, it more affects the decision receiving population rather than the decision giving authority. Individual, who has right to live in a country, is more aware about the consequence of his or her decision. Nevertheless, when we talk about judicious decision, or a decision that affects a large population, it should be given by an expert in that field. Hence, I generally agree with the opinion that an expert's decision in any field is more valued than a laymen person's decision in the same issue.
Firstly, look at the history of our solar system relative positions. Several scientists have given several opinions about, whether Earth is flat or rounded, or Earth round the Sun or Sun rounds the Earth. Moreover, there are several theories are given about Time travels, some says it is possible, some says it not. After all these opinions, finally what we believe ? We believe things, that are proven by a reknown scientist. We see evidencs, which are given by an expert of that field. An opinion can not be made as a Fact until or unless it is proven and shown by an expert.
Secondly, when we talk about the legal matters, then can any person become judge or Chief Justice. The answer would be, No. There are lots of prerequisites are required for such a prestigious post. A judge, has experience of solving cases, giving propitious decision, looking meticulously evidences and other. When we talk about India, then in Indian's village, there are several Sarpanchs ( Head of a village who generally handle the administration of Indian's villages ), these Sarpanch generally used to give decisions regarding land dispute issues, civil disputes issue etc. Although, they are not authorized to judge these cases, but the generally do. In spite of these, when it comes to Court, there decision become valueless. Court's persons are expert in these, sarpachs are not.
Admittedly, there are decision which are not required for an expert's opinion. This is specially true, when it comes to the effect of the decision. Like a child's career, an expert can not decide his future, what is good or bad for him. He is laymen, but his decisions are always welcomed. Consequently, this above argument does not constitue sufficient support to say that a judgement from non expert should be welcomed.
In summary, critical decision given by a seasoned person or organization or group have more value.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 70
- Knowledge is an important part of our life Some people prefer having deep knowledge about one particular subject while others prefer having widespread knowledge about a variety of subjects Which do you prefer and why 88
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic But last 58
- Having children is less important than it was in the past 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solar system relative positions. Several scientists have given several opinions a...
^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ans village, there are several Sarpanchs Head of a village who generally handle t...
^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e the administration of Indians villages , these Sarpanch generally used to give d...
^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this Sarpanch' or 'these sarpanches'?
Suggestion: this Sarpanch; these sarpanches
...he administration of Indians villages , these Sarpanch generally used to give decisions regard...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
... decision which are not required for an experts opinion. This is specially true, when i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, look, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, after all, in summary, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02008928571 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74201061672 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5778791369 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2962962963 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5925925926 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7037037037 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223650660084 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606496992069 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676922972665 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116862421762 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057460733858 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.