Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Work has been our part of life, for some it is to make a good loving by earning money while for some it’s passion and devotion in their life. Either way, working in a same field for so long makes us well experience and because of which people are called expert. With long time in the same field enable us to judge the work which is valuable. I’m consonant with the author’s statement that critical judgement of work is valuable when it comes from expert in that field.
First of all, Expert in any field are the one with lots of experience in depth and have acquired years of knowledge which makes them valuable in the judgement of the same field. For instance, In a company we need to recruit software developers and delegate work on building web application. If the recruiting process is handled with someone from non tech industry, then he/she will surely lack the proper judgement on how the project should be handed to the developers for work. On the other hand, this process would be very effective when done by someone expert on tech industry.
Secondly, The work done in the medical industry will be completely confusing to someone from engineering field. It becomes absurd to make judgement on medical work by engineers who lack knowledge and experience. The case is same, When the case is reversed where medical student will not be able to make good judgement on engineering work.
Finally, Some people might argue that even with little knowledge of other fields you are not expert on can make judgement to that field. This might hold true to some extend when the person is enthusiast to that field, but they still lack acute judgement compared to the expert. The experience and knowledge what makes people an expert plays pivotal role on how well one can have a valuable judgement.
In sum, The valuable judgement comes from the expert of the field rather than someone who is not. The value of the judgement depicts the knowledge and experience gathered by the expert for a long period of his work in that field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 77
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...hat field. This might hold true to some extend when the person is enthusiast to that f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42358276585 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464985994398 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4231169591 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.875 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296448031921 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115921280687 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685070132118 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180271986907 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591728371165 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.