Decisions taken by an emotional person and justified by logic are the most poor decisions.
A healthy person is not just characterized by physical fitness; Mental or emotional fitness is vital too. Emotional fitness enables a person to make informed choices. A person who is stable emotionally, will be able to take the right decisions.
To expound the above statement, let us take an example. People, who are not emotionally vulnerable, will be more practical. Their apathy would make them think rationally and be down to earth. Their decisions would, for sure benefit them. On the contrary, a person who is more emotionally attached to others, will try to take a decision that not only benefits them, but also people who are directly connected to them. Thus, they would obviously waste a lot of time to arrive at the decision, and the irony is, it might not serve to be the best decision too.
A person who is more emotionally stable is bound to make a more logical decision. His thinking would be right to the point. Rather, if you consider a person who is very emotional, would be blinded by sentiments. Thus, the logical side of the issue won't be visulaized. It's not surprising that, over a point of time, he might even seem to be mawkish. The more he justifies, the greater he appears to be dumb. His justifications would seem frivolous.
Thus, the only way to ameliorate your way of thinking is to keep your sentiments aside and start thinking rationally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | srilakshmi1598 | 33 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A healthy person is not just characteriz...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able to take the right decisions. To expound the above statement, let us t...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...serve to be the best decision too. A person who is more emotionally stable ...
^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tifications would seem frivolous. Thus, the only way to ameliorate your wa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 239.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82426778243 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74568818193 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55230125523 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9707686013 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.8235294118 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.0588235294 23.4991977007 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.35294117647 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165944082162 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567685430389 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517092638826 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974707577163 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671801786689 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.