The author of the topic states that it educational institutions's responsibility to dissuade its student from striving for the fields of study that they are impossible to succeed in. Due to the controversial nature of the question, there is not a general argument for this issue. I am, however, to a great extend, against this statement. In the ensuing paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated.
For one thing, it is nearly impossible for someone the predict weather a student will succeed in a particular field. Take Edison for example, when he was young, his teacher even thought that he was a fool and unsuitable to continue his study. At that time, who can image such a wired boy can achive such great success in the future? And fortunately, his mother did not give him up for what his teacher said and patiently educate Edison at home. In this case, we should learn that a person's potential is unpredictable and we do not have the right to deny anyone's right to pursuit his dream.
For another, sometimes, for a person, what matters is not weather he will succeed in a particular field but weather he enjoys what he is engaged in. Let us boldly image that a student really like math and want to choose math as his further study direction. He feels satisfied and enjoyable when he is doing math. But his school persuade him to be a writer since he gets a much higher grade in writing than in math. We can image that even thought this student may write something popular in the future, he may just regard writing as a way to make a living but could not get fun and interests in it. In this case,we should learned that success is not the only thing we need to consider when choose what to pursue in the future.
However, what I have allude above does not draw the whole picture and be suitable for all the contexts. In some case, like in a college, it is indeed a professor's responsibility to give advice to his students about which field he may not succeed, because a professor may have much more experience and knowledge than the students, who may be misled by the superfacial aspects of thing.
In conclusion, normally an educational institution do not have the responsibility or even the right to dissuade its students from pursing fields of study that they personally think the student will not succeed in.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- 49) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng, it is nearly impossible for someone the predict weather a student will succeed in a par...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'alluded'.
Suggestion: alluded
... in the future. However, what I have allude above does not draw the whole picture a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...case, like in a college, it is indeed a professors responsibility to give advice to his st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, really, so, for example, in conclusion, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62291169451 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63252206424 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484486873508 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 7.0 0.740449438202 945% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5907666194 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.611111111 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261414700543 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816607278217 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132850338277 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200344551216 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148134505348 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.