I don’t agree with the claim. Take for example, the career option of entrepreneurship. The career itself has bleak success rate. Out of 100 startups which starts in college, nearly 99 of them shut down within three years of operation. It is impossible for an institution to evaluate a candidate potential to be a successful entrepreneur. Moreover, even if the candidate wins several rewards and raise seed funding, still it is extremely hard to predict that the startup is going to survive in the next 3 years. The role of Educational institutions should be to provide children with multitude of meaningful experiences which can help one identify their own strengths and weakness and then take sound decision to pursue a particular career path. Building self-esteem should be given prime importance and even if the students fail in the path they pursue, they should have the tenacity to bounce back. We don’t learn the cycle on the same day. Some learn it quickly for other, they learn at their own pace. Providing an ecosystem of learning at their own pace is what the institutions aim for. We see some many graduates starting as a chemical engineer due to the family pressure to pursue engineering and then becoming artists in long run. Take care of Raghu Ram of Indian Ocean band. A trained chemist (PHD from Cornell) and then started diverged to start his own band and now a successful musician. Take another example of Sunny Bansal, a computer science student at IIT Delhi. He started a store which used to deliver books to the customers. Later, the same small firm got converted into the e-commerce giant known today as Flipkart. So, I don’t support the claim that educational institution should dissuade students from pursuing the field they are unlikely to succeed because one doesn’t really know that until they give it a shot! Also, we got one life, rather than living and being successful at someone else’s stale dreams its always better to fail at something close to heart! At least you tried, isn’t it?
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: prernarana03
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1955, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ful at someone else's stale dreams its always better to fail at something clos...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, really, so, still, then, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94186046512 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72415829186 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636627906977 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 86.2787615312 60.3974514979 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213412566604 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043120250073 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055744878678 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213412566604 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.