Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of
study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Success is the ability to excel in a particular area of choice. The probability of student succeeding in a particular field of study relies on so many factors in which the institution they are studying is one of them.
Institution should not be the pivot in shaping student opinion and perspective towards pursuing a particular field or not. Ability for student to choose by themselves has led to discovery of many new talents in other field other than the one they started with. A good example of this is former Minister of Finance in Nigeria who started as art student but later graduated as economist and rose to become one of the greatest economists in this century.
In my opinion, I strongly disagree that institution has a greater impact in dissuading student from pursuing the field they are unlikely to be succeed because success does not depend on a factor but it rather depend on passion. A passionate art and humanities student can raise up to become the most successful doctor in the century if he/she has an undying passion for medicine but got deprive of science education because of one reason or the other.
Trying a new thing is what brought so great invention today so any student that has passion to pursue a new field that is different from the where they are coming from might looks unlikely to succeed to an institution but the ability succeed in a new relied much on how many energies and passion the student his/herself is putting in his/her field.
Studying a new field can show a hidden talent that got hidden maybe because of the parent forcing a child to choose the field they want. A cousin of mine was forced by his father to study science as against his wish to study art and humanities, this single act cause him to fail in chemistry and mathematics but he later wrote a novel that got accepted to the state library board. Even though he later achieved his goal but this single act of discouraging he receive from his institution to study science rather than art cause him to almost lose focus and this cause us to almost loose a talent that can save the nation intellectually.
From this perspectives above I believe student should be given chance to pursue any field they like and the institution should realize that the success of any student depends on mainly on their personal passion and conviction.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'depends'?
Suggestion: depends
...es not depend on a factor but it rather depend on passion. A passionate art and humani...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 460, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'receives'.
Suggestion: receives
... but this single act of discouraging he receive from his institution to study science r...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cause him to almost lose focus and this cause us to almost loose a talent that c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, as for, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71844660194 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57686528681 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466019417476 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7122849929 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.0 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371751984405 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143544893322 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111205628265 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206268839175 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058154655985 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.