Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The above statement has firm logical grounds as it is important for the students to pursue the fields in which they are likely to succed as the basic criteria to be successful an individual requires interest in that paticular field. As it has been said,"To be successful we need to love what we are doing".
In a survey conducted in India it was dipicted that 95% of the population who have worked in a paticular area of expertise for approximately 10 years don't love that domain. The major reason for this to happen is that the educational institutions did not conduct their career counselling, due to this plenty of people spend their life being a mediocre at a job he/she never wanted to do. Now, look at the other side of the picture if a school conducts career guidance sessions then majority of men/women passing out from that place know what to choose, where to go and how do they execute their plan.
In contradiction to the above suggestion, numerous fellows would state that the eductaion should be imbibed in such a manner that each and everyone says that they can be successfull everywhere. No doubts about it, that the manner to provide knowledge is important and the better the manner the better people perform in the area. But, There are some inborn talents and the students should be helped to recognise them and use them in their daily routine to earn money.
Moreover, money is something that money factor might motivate you to work in the initial stages but latter on you need to love your routine. The tasks provided to people become fun only when they do it whole heartedly.
In a nutshell, It is the main resposibilities of the educational institutions to guide people to work in those domains in which they are going to succed i.e. they are interested in, becuse if they don't then who will.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situations such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey firstborn infant monkeys prod 40
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 30
- The Government should focus on immediate problems and on the anticipated problems 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...hat paticular field. As it has been said,'To be successful we need to love what w...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of expertise for approximately 10 years dont love that domain. The major reason for ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... they are interested in, becuse if they dont then who will.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, then, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69470404984 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65280483125 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5846411891 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166609948028 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554628452452 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643866662899 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903438768867 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605840643974 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.