Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The issue of whether or not schools should discourage students to enroll into programs which they have less chances of success is a contentious one. I believe that, education institutions should guide students to make better choices of studies because they have experience in these fields. Furthermore, it will help students to save cost and time.
First, learning organizations have necessary resources and experience to guide students. A student who has just finished high school who is not be aware of what degree program to pursue at the university needs guidance. Some students could have a rough idea of what they would like to become later, say a computer specialist, but universities have a wide range of programs such as Information and communication technology (ICT), ICT management, computer engineering, information system. A student will be confused with all these options. Here is when the role of university comes into play for example if a candidate has poor mathematical background then he should be advice to take ICT management rather than Engineering.
Second, save time and money. If a student engages in a program only to discover that, he cannot cope and eventually fail it will be a total waste of time. When same student join a program which has a higher chance of success, he will be more motivated. Based on lessoned learned from previous students and experience of professors, students can take the most successful path.
Some may argue that, dissuading students is bad because it will go against students’ interest. This point is flawed because; even if they have developed their interest in different fields but if they have poor background will have less chances of survival.
In conclusion, the academic institutions should be responsible for to ensure students pursues courses in which are more advantageous to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-10-05 | jolly biju | 41 | view |
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 41
- The Commercial airline industry in the country of Freedonia has experienced impressive growth in the past three years. This trend will surely continue in the years to come, since the airline industry will benefit from recent changes in Freedonian society: 50
- Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown. 66
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not schools should discourage students to e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...to enroll into programs which they have less chances of success is a contentious one...
^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...as just finished high school who is not be aware of what degree program to pursue ...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...e the most successful path. Some may argue that, dissuading students is bad becaus...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... if they have poor background will have less chances of survival. In conclusion, ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248502994012 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.173652694611 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0808383233533 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0449101796407 0.0497285424764 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0419161676647 0.0444667217837 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110778443114 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0299401197605 0.0406280797675 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9342782569 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0299401197605 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0688622754491 0.0997080785238 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0449101796407 0.0249443105267 180% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0269461077844 0.0148568991511 181% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1863.0 2732.02544248 68% => OK
No of words: 300.0 452.878318584 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376666666667 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.306666666667 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22 0.200843997647 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143333333333 0.132149295362 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9342782569 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 219.290929204 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.48968727796 120% => OK
Word variations: 64.4685163622 55.4138127331 116% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3297434754 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.674092028746 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 50.6666666667 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.49425287356 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339500829836 0.391690518653 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0742803563553 0.123202303941 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.060807611187 0.077325440228 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.532626950065 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.194178672294 0.149214159877 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123608849024 0.161403998019 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862812686803 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.187640943283 0.385218514788 49% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10183793521 0.0692045440612 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221329011947 0.275328986314 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774385336576 0.0653680567796 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.