Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The issue of whether or not educational institutions have an accountability to forbid students to pursue field in which they will not get success is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weakness, I believe, it is not the responsibility of educational institution because institution typically consider performance as a major factor and judge students according to their marks.
Primarily, marks are only a “number” and on the basis of number, one cannot decide the future of students and cannot stop them to pursue in a particular field. There are many people who have not only proved erroneous to their teachers, but also, became inspiration of many other people. For an example, according to the teachers of Albert Einstein, he could not get the success in the field of study which proved fallacious, when he emerged as a great scientist by proving the theory of relativity.
Some may argue that many students are not enough capable to take correct decision, and teacher can guide them to follow the right track on the basis of their knowledge and experience. But, what is the surety that their knowledge and experience will worth for students? For an example, Thomas Edison teacher said that he was “too stupid to learn anything”, and later he went to carve out of his spot as one of history’s most important inventors. This Example state that knowledge and experience of teacher didn’t work at all.
In conclusion, educational institution should not dissuade students to follow their dream because their suggestion can prove beneficial for one, while it can be the destructive for other which means that decision cannot be made out on the basis of possibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-04 | shivam dixit | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not educational institutions have an accoun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eir marks. Primarily, marks are only a apos;number apos; and on the basis of ...
^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir marks. Primarily, marks are only a apos;number apos; and on the basis of nu...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t by proving the theory of relativity. Some may argue that many students are no...
^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... the theory of relativity. Some may argue that many students are not enough capab...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Thomas Edison teacher said that he was apos;too stupid to learn anything apos;,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 285.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05614035088 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82096534734 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5107196855 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.1 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230308321933 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908430985232 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969316902315 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154378432128 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115545425232 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.