Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi

Essay topics:

Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Choosing the field of study is one of the hardest decisions a young adult needs to make. Giving that challenge some people believe that educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful. That claim should not be taken into consideration and it needs be discussed in a deeper level for two main reasons: if everyone prefers those fields, some other ones will face a deficiency of professionals. Also, the amount of jobs available will not guarantee fulfillment for one’s professional life.
It is true that not all the fields on the market have the same amount of job opportunities. But that should not be used as a main guide for such an important decision. Considering the market only, if many people choose the same field, the number of available professionals in certain areas would be exceedingly small, provoking an enormous deficiency of professionals in those areas. For example, the world need doctors and the demand on that area will always exist. But if most people decide to study medicine, we will not have enough engineers and nurses. This would generate a problem since we need nurses to take care of people in a way that doctors cannot and engineers to build the hospitals for instance. So, encouraging the students to go to where the bigger opportunities are would impact on the market.
Another point that should be taken into consideration is fulfillment with the work you are doing. People have different likes and dislikes. Not everyone would like to be a doctor, a lawyer or a nurse. Many studies have shown a correlation between the appreciation for your occupation and the performance of your work. The more you enjoy what you do, the better you will do. Giving that, pushing someone into a direction they would not choose on the first place might generate an adult who is unsatisfied with their professional life.
One counterpoint on this is that the choice of area needs to made in a very young age so it’s a bit early to tell if they are positively going to like or dislike and they will know the chances to get a successful career is higher . But a better decision can be made if they take their refers into consideration. Driving students to certain fields based on market availability is not the smartest move for them and the market itself.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-10 Hanfeng Zhou 66 view
2021-08-01 Ruth Ogboye 50 view
2021-05-17 Simardeep Singh Sethi 66 view
2020-09-29 batol70455@farmdeu.com 60 view
2020-09-27 batol70455@farmdeu.com 60 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'need'?
Suggestion: need
... of the hardest decisions a young adult needs to make. Giving that challenge some peo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ces to get a successful career is higher . But a better decision can be made if th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83126550868 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76235294891 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506203473945 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4857691354 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.35 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.15 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199086807535 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601668298128 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084552169227 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121590687189 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810065286872 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'need'?
Suggestion: need
... of the hardest decisions a young adult needs to make. Giving that challenge some peo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ces to get a successful career is higher . But a better decision can be made if th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for example, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83126550868 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76235294891 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506203473945 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4857691354 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.35 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.15 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199086807535 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601668298128 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084552169227 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121590687189 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810065286872 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.