Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Without a doubt, in today's world, it is known that students graduating from university, college, or high school have a harder time finding a job than 50 years ago. Many factors come into play as to why this could be the case- the bar for educational standards are getting higher, the number of jobs offered are decreasing, and many other reasons. In this view, educational institutions should educate students on potential future careers, and support the path the student chooses.
In the view of the issue, educational institutes should guide students towards these careers that have multiple job openings and this would make sense especially if job openings are seemingly diminishing. However, it does not necessarily mean new jobs cannot be created. In this day and age, technology has vastly altered the landscape of job opportunities that can be realized. For example, it is commonly heard that a biologist graduating from univeristy will have a hard time finding a job in the city of Vancouver. However, with the internet, the scientiest has the opportunity to look at job applications worldwide and at research institutes that have the resources for biologists. With the decreasing risk of not finding a job, individuals are able to look world wide for opportunities and should therefore continue to pursue their passion.
Together with increased opportunities worldwide, individuals are able study their passions and be happy with their educational career should it be their desired field. There are associated benefits with individuals being happy at their work. Studies have shown that individuals who enjoy their work are more likely to work harder and lead a healthier life. If someone were to be influenced to study a field they were not passionate about to begin with, it would be hard to motivate them to be a good worker and be less of a contributer to the workforce had they chosen a field they were interested in.
While students may choose a path that may not have plentiful jobs, an educational institution should support the students decision. An art student that has been suppressed to go into the field of business just because of potential job opportunity may not even end up working in business if she so hates it. At the same time, the individual would have had to spend their time, money, and emotion to go through university training to become a businesswoman- a waste of resources in hindsight. In this situation, would she had gone to art school, she would have been happier and perhaps even developed her skills as an artist. To reference the second paragraph, she would not need to use traditional paths to make a living, she could make her living through small artist jobs or selling her art online. Educational institutions should encourage students to follow their passions, but educate individuals on what potential future careers they may lead to.
As discussed, it is important for individuals to pursue their passions and educational institutions should support that.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-21 | Daffodilia | 83 | view |
2019-09-25 | candiesj | 66 | view |
2019-09-11 | fredericomasc | 66 | view |
2019-08-21 | saloni.p | 50 | view |
2019-06-24 | Primace | 95 | view |
- Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people.Write a 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 66
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 764, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ing a job, individuals are able to look world wide for opportunities and should therefore ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 764, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ing a job, individuals are able to look world wide for opportunities and should therefore ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 430, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becoming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: becoming
...otion to go through university training to become a businesswoman- a waste of resources i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2534.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10887096774 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86156758371 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491935483871 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3367572507 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.7 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196775611753 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711915850612 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516125487055 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1250523877 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199687824631 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.