How the education institution works is always the main point when talking about teaching. Some might consider students to specialize in what they’re good at, and to ignore those they are inept in. Yet, even if it actually saves time for students in doing those fields they’re unlikely to succeed, this situation may result in pupils’ limitation for exploring talent, and also lacks universal standards for schools to filter the goods out of the bad.
To elaborate, first of all, it is hard for some students to explore extracurricular activities during their break. As a student in Taiwan, the school schedules are usually full, and thus during the recess, we instead do homework than seeking our true interest. Eventually, we fix all our attention on the curriculum which our school arrange for us, and lack the motivation in exploring talent in return. In addition, as the saying goes,” Practice makes perfect.” Even if they are now clumsy in some fields, they still may expert them in the future. Last but not least, it would be hard for schools when it comes to admitting students for there is no such universal standard for them to refer to.
On the other hand, some may hold that requiring students to pursuing just only ones they excel in leads to professionality and uniqueness, and in turn solve the problem of incapability in skill. However, in the ever-changing society, professionality is not the only thing that we have to possess. What’s more important is how we merge what we have learned, even the most disparage fields, together to make use of them in our daily lives. Moreover, the more skills we gain, the lower the unemployment rate is. As long as we get proficient in many fields, there won’t be a big problem when we lose job for that switching a career may be a piece of cake. Consequently, in the education system, various subjects are needed for the curriculum.
Admittedly, whether educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed may be weighed in many aspects. Different people have different explanations based on various personal experiences and beliefs. However, according to the reasons and discussions mentioned above, I may safely draw the conclusion that instead of specialization, variation is required when talking about educational institutions.
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...return. In addition, as the saying goes,” Practice makes perfect.” Even if they a...
^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...he saying goes,” Practice makes perfect.” Even if they are now clumsy in some fie...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, in addition, talking about, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10539845758 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89920048163 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570694087404 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2251148801 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.823529412 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192516338311 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620622901037 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820372087668 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132002023499 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731964760891 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.