Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws
Undoubtedly, laws were made for making the society a safer place to live for human beings and obeying them usually prevents the society from being disturbed. however, it is really important that people who make the laws of a country should be impartial and just consider the benefits of all people not themselves or the government. In some cases it’s not simple to predict the consequences of obeying just laws or disobeying unjust laws. So I cannot completely agree with the claim.
Firstly, we should consider the exact definition of just laws. just laws are laws that are considered true by society. In democratic countries these kinds of laws are compatible with human rights and in these situation it’s our duty to obey these laws. but we should notice that the consideration of a law as true doesn’t mean that it’s really true. For example In some countries government using religious to manipulate most people of a country to believe something wrong as a just law and convince them to obeying it.
Secondly, making the right decision between obeying or disobeying unjust laws is more challenging. In democratic countries there are legal way to protest to these laws. for example in the past abortion was illegal but after a lot of efforts by women right defender it becomes legal. In this situation the best thing is obeying the unjust laws to prevent the society from chaos but we should do our best to nullify these laws. however in dictatorial countries the condition is different. In most cases the government doesn’t care about people’s protestation and there isn’t any legal way to abrogate unjust laws. For example in Iran women have to put scarf and hide their hair from other people in the society and if anybody dissent this law consider as an impious or even criminal. In my opinion in these circumstances obeying unjust laws reinforced them and people should fight with these laws by disobeying them but in a peaceful way.
In Conclusion, it’s not always easy to distinguish between just laws and unjust laws and the most important thing is that every person in the society should try to reinforce the just laws and invalidate the unjust laws. but we should also consider that the way of face these laws is depend on the government’s policy.
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws 50
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with 63
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative actions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent you agree or disagree with the recommendation made. Describe specific circumstances in adopting recommendation would or wouldn 50
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.Write a res 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...vents the society from being disturbed. however, it is really important that people who...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...ider the exact definition of just laws. just laws are laws that are considered true ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'these situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; these situations
...are compatible with human rights and in these situation it's our duty to obey these laws. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... it's our duty to obey these laws. but we should notice that the consideration...
^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...apos;s really true. For example In some countries government using religious to manipulat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...are legal way to protest to these laws. for example in the past abortion was illega...
^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ould do our best to nullify these laws. however in dictatorial countries the condition ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...ould do our best to nullify these laws. however in dictatorial countries the condition ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 934, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a peaceful way" with adverb for "peaceful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... with these laws by disobeying them but in a peaceful way. In Conclusion, it's not always...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...st laws and invalidate the unjust laws. but we should also consider that the way of...
^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ider that the way of face these laws is depend on the government's policy.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in most cases, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96649484536 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73455794466 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453608247423 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4836026516 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.421052632 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379207170602 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138600660934 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122241764668 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284460486933 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472251438783 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.