The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The author here argues that super screen should allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through the advertising. To support his argument author has mentioned some points. First, the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewer about specific super screen movies actually increased during the past year even that the fewer people attend movies in past year. In addition to that clearly, the contents of the these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. and lastly, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awarness that movies of good quality are available. thus, I generally diagree with the opinion of the author and despite the facts represented by the author. The argument contains number of logical LOOPHOLES that succeed in making the argument sound unconvinicing.
Firstly this is merely an assumption made without much solid ground. The author mention that the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewer about specific super screen movies actually increased during the past year even that the fewer people attend movies in past year. The doesn't mentioned the figure of how many viewer that have reviewed the movie and maybe the movies showed at that times are really a positive movies and type of movies changes ever time. Hence, the argument would have been more convincing if it explicitly stated that figure of the viewers that have reviewed the movie.
Secondly, the argument readily claims that clearly, the contents of the these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awarness that movies of good quality are available.Again here author have not mentioned the figure,
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 509, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...hing enough of our prospective viewers. and lastly, the problem lies not with the q...
^^^
Line 1, column 650, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...t movies of good quality are available. thus, I generally diagree with the opinion o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... people attend movies in past year. The doesnt mentioned the figure of how many viewer...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun viewer seems to be countable; consider using: 'many viewers'.
Suggestion: many viewers
... The doesnt mentioned the figure of how many viewer that have reviewed the movie and maybe ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...hing enough of our prospective viewers. thus, the problem lies not with the quality ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Again
...at movies of good quality are available.Again here author have not mentioned the figu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, really, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16095890411 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39442836646 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452054794521 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5800921419 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23171952655 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828987907631 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108633545466 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169032545242 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648715756169 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.