A nation is the embodiment of its people. We can't talk about a nation without talking about its people. Naturally, nations vary in attributes as they are formed in different circumstances. Some have great cultural richness to show, others can boast their scientific feats and still others, their history. If we were to gauge a nation's greatness, we must be shrewd to select parameters on which such nations can be unambiguously compared. The general welfare of a nation is an apt parameter for such kind of endeavor.
The achievements of certain people can't speak for the greatness of a whole nation, be it scientists, artists or rulers. A nation's growth is dependent upon its public far more than any distinct individual. For instance, the middle east was the seat for great kingdoms for many centuries. Also, it was credited to have been a mathematical hot-spot, spurning mathematicians and algebra. Irrespective of these, the region now is ravaged in war, suffering from human indignities. The causes for this can be pinned to the public's dissatisfaction of governance and the state in general, more confidently than anything else. Radical groups have sprung up, because of lack of opportunities and penury among the youth of these nations.
Now in contrast, let's look at the history of the small island of Singapore. Even after having such meagre resources and geographical constraints, this nation sprouted as a technological n' economical hub. The fervent people of this nation notably were responsible for their turnaround. Even though they did not have as many great achievers to show, their developed societies and edge in technology easily peg them as having an atmosphere coveted by many others in Asia.
Many developed nations do have its fair share of great people to pride about. Indeed, they can be used as evidence as to how deserving their culture and society is. Most of the European countries have a rich and great history behind them. Same can be said about almost all the rich and developed nations. But relating greatness of the nation with a bunch of its high achievers is a folly. South Korea's or as a matter of fact Japan's economic dominance didn't come through because there were a lot of great people working to usher it, but because the general mass of these very nations toiled to ameliorate their life standards. The respective governments took specific steps in terms of policies to goad them on, while their culture and society was postured to prove conducive to the whole effort. Even if a few great people did contribute to such revolutions, the whole credit cannot be taken by them. These nations achieved unprecedented level of public welfare in Asia and around the world.
A nation can produce great artists, rulers and scientists by happenstance (which is quite rare) or thorough its social systems. The latter is way more likely to occur. Germany for example had great scientists in the early twentieth century, who made her the center of theoretical research. These scientists though can be thought of as the product of the German academic institutions and cultural nuances. The German institutes at that time were reputed as being the best in their discipline, while the public is respected as having a taste for 'reason'. All this is intimately related with the welfare of the public from which these great humans seemingly came. Hadn't the society developed into cherishing knowledge and innovation by insuring a basic standard of living for its public. Most of these people would have been embroiled with matters more trivial than these. Exactly what her history witnessed during the first and second World War.
General welfare is the most unambiguous parameter thorough which a nation's greatness can be measured. It gives a better understanding of the average guy's life in it and how people of that nation collectively better themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ion is the embodiment of its people. We cant talk about a nation without talking abo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...s, their history. If we were to gauge a nations greatness, we must be shrewd to select ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...r. The achievements of certain people cant speak for the greatness of a whole nati...
^^^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... be it scientists, artists or rulers. A nations growth is dependent upon its public far...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...he causes for this can be pinned to the publics dissatisfaction of governance and the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...atter of fact Japans economic dominance didnt come through because there were a lot o...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 658, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Hadn't
...hich these great humans seemingly came. Hadnt the society developed into cherishing k...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... unambiguous parameter thorough which a nations greatness can be measured. It gives a b...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nation collectively better themselves.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in contrast, in general, kind of, talking about, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3245.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 643.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0466562986 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.03561760524 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76719709261 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 329.0 215.323595506 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51166407465 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1016.1 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0470663117 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7027027027 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3783783784 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21621621622 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245460538365 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678974856676 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666429612372 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153597440075 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528115992449 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 100.480337079 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.