Great scientists, artists and rulers will leave a long-lasting legacy, but why should a nation focus its efforts and money in building that legacy when it can just use those funds to make the life of its citizens better today? That is, after all, the ultimate goal of a nation. So which is the greater nation: The one which focuses on having a good present, or the one which focuses on building a better future?
Of course, the answer depends on how you define "greatness". It is a blurry term, and it will have different connotations for different people. A nation can be "great" if it's large, powerful and/or influential, or if it is generally pleasant to live in. Often these two traits intersect. After all, Ancient Rome was big, powerful, influential and mostly pleasant to live in. It is common sense that a nation should keep most of its citizens happy if it intends to last for a long time. However, is one of them more important than the other when it comes to greatness? I would argue that they are both equally important, but that in a world filled with nations ferociously competing among each other, power and influence are the standard measure of "greatness". Plus, history remembers the nations that made the most important achievements above all the others.
An oppressed citizen of the "great" Nazi Germany which made significant medical discoveries and managed to conquer a large amount of Europe would disagree, but ultimately this is a personal question: Which definition of "great" do you want to consider?
- the following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper."The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time perio 83
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 50
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, after all, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 262.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04580152672 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.247981717 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4241903312 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371187690396 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113429487153 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886759952042 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241314111517 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188336944736 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.